Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others — John Shaqi
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
This the Scholastic dared not admit. The God must not, in his opinion,
enter into him and speak forth from him; God must only be in him
as an image. In reality, the Godhead must be external to the self.
Accordingly, also, it could not reveal itself from within through
the spiritual life, but must reveal itself from outside, through
supernatural communication. What is aimed at in this, is just exactly
what is least of all attained thereby. It is sought to attain to the
highest possible conception of the Godhead. In reality, the Godhead
is dragged down and made a thing among other things; only that these
other things reveal themselves to us naturally, through experience;
while the Godhead is supposed to reveal Itself to us supernaturally.
A difference, however, between the knowledge of the divine and of
the created is attained in this way: that as regards the created,
the external thing is given in experience, so that we have knowledge
of it; while as regards the divine, the object is not given to us in
experience; we can reach it only in faith.
The highest things, therefore, are for the Scholastic not objects
of knowledge, but mainly of faith. It is true that the relation
of knowledge to faith must not be so conceived, according to the
Scholastic view, as if in a certain domain only knowledge, and in
another only faith reigned. For “the knowledge of that which is, is
possible to us, because it, itself, springs from a creative element;
things are for the spirit, because they are from the spirit; they
have something to tell us, because they have a meaning which a higher
intelligence has placed in them.”[12] Because God has created the
world according to thoughts, we too are able, when we grasp the
thoughts of the world, to seize also upon the traces of the Divine in
the world, through scientific reflection. But what God is, according
to His own being, we can learn only from that revelation which He has
given to us in supernatural ways, and in which we must believe. What
we ought to think about the highest things, must be decided not by
any human knowledge, but by faith; and “to faith belongs all that is
contained in the writings of the New and of the Old Testament, and in
the divine traditions.”[13]
[12] Otto Willman, _History of Idealism_, vol. ii., p. 383.
[13] Joseph Kleutgen, _Die Theologie der Vorzeit_, vol. i., p. 39.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account