Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
What the things reveal in this re-birth did not previously belong
to them. There, without, stands the tree. I take it up into my
consciousness. I throw my inner light upon that which I have thus
conceived. The tree becomes in me more than it is outside. That in it
which finds entrance through the gate of the senses is taken up into a
conscious content. An ideal replica of the tree is within me, and that
has infinitely more to say about the tree than what the tree itself,
outside, can tell me. Then, for the first time there shines out from
within me, towards the tree, what the tree is. The tree is now no
longer the isolated being that it is out there in space. It becomes
a link in the entire conscious world that lives in me. It links its
content with other ideas that are in me. It becomes a member of the
whole world of ideas that embraces the vegetable kingdom; it takes its
place, further, in the series of all that lives.
Another example: I throw a stone in a horizontal direction away from
me. It moves in a curved line and after some time falls to the ground.
I see it in successive moments of time in different places. Through
observation and reflection I acquire the following: During its motion
the stone is subject to different influences. If it were subject only
to the influence of the impulse which I imparted to it, it would go
on flying for ever in a straight line, without altering its velocity.
But now the earth exerts an influence upon it. It attracts the stone
towards itself. If, instead of throwing the stone, I had simply let it
go, it would have fallen vertically to earth; and its velocity in doing
so would have constantly increased. From the mutual interaction of
these two influences arises that which I actually see.
Let us assume that I could not in thought separate the two influences,
and from this orderly combination put together again in thought what
I see: in that case, the matter would end with the actual happening.
It would be mentally a blind staring at what happened; a perception of
the successive positions which the stone occupies. But in actual fact,
matters do _not_ stop there. The whole occurrence takes place twice.
Once outside, and then my eye sees it; then my mind causes the whole
happening to repeat itself again, in a mental or conscious manner. My
inner sense must be directed upon the mental occurrence, which my eye
does not see, and then it becomes clear to that sense that I, by my own
inner power, awaken that occurrence as a mental one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account