Mythology among the Hebrews and Its Historical DevelopmentGoldziher, Ignác
Religion
Mythology among the Hebrews and Its Historical Development
Goldziher, Ignác
Jewish mythology; Judaism -- History -- To 70 A.D.
See the article ‘Das Epos’ in _Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie_, &c.
1868, V. 8, 10.
Footnote 157:
Nöldeke, _Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Poesie der alten Araber_, p. 185.
12.
Footnote 158:
_Kitâb al-aġânî_, VI. 137. 17.
Footnote 159:
_Durrat al-ġauwâs_ (ed. Thorbecke), p. 178. 4.
Footnote 160:
Yâḳût, I. 934. 2.
Footnote 161:
_Romance of ʿAntar_, IV. 97. 2.
Footnote 162:
This connexion is found among the Polynesians: ‘The time-reckoning in
all Polynesia conformed to the moon. They reckoned by nights,’ &c.,
Gerland, _Anthropologie der Naturvölker_. 71. Only the nights had
names, the days had none, _ibid._, pp. 72. Both the chronology
according to moons and the counting of days by nights are
linguistically demonstrated of the Melanesian group. See the
comparison in Gerland, _ibid._, pp. 616–619.
Footnote 163:
Laz. Geiger, _Ursprung und Entwicklung der menschlichen Sprache und
Vernunft_, II. 270.
Footnote 164:
_Die heiligen Schriften der Parsen_, in German, II. xcviii. and III.
xx.
Footnote 165:
_God in History_, II. 433–5.
Footnote 166:
_De Bello Gallico_, VI. 18: ‘Spatia omnis temporis non numero dierum,
sed noctium finiunt; dies natales et mensium et annorum initia sic
observant, ut _noctem dies subsequatur_.’
Footnote 167:
_Germania_, XI: ‘Nec dierum numerum, ut nos, sed noctium computant.
Sic constituunt, sic condicunt: _nox ducere diem videtur_,’ in
connexion with the public assemblies at the changes of the moon. The
fact must not be overlooked that, according to Caesar, _ibid._ 22, the
Germans ‘agriculturae non student, majorque pars victus eorum in
lacte, caseo, carne consistit.’ See also, on this subject, Pictet,
_Les origines Indo-Européennes et les Aryas primitifs_, II. 588.
Footnote 168:
And in ‘Se'nnight.’—TR.
Footnote 169:
The identical English term ‘Leap year’ is another apposite
example.—TR.
Footnote 170:
See the Hungarian review, _Magyar Nyelvőr_, I. 26–28.
Footnote 171:
In Rawlinson’s _History of Herodotus_, App. to Book II. chap. VII. §
16–20 (ed. of 1862, vol. II. p. 282 _et seq._).
Footnote 172:
Waitz, _l. c._ IV. 174.
Footnote 173:
See Karl Andree, _Forschungsreisen_, &c., II. 205.
Footnote 174:
Mommsen, _History of Rome_, I. 217 (ed. 1862), 230 (ed. 1868).
Footnote 175:
Welcker, _Griechische Götterlehre_, I. 555.
Footnote 176:
Sir Gardner Wilkinson, in Rawlinson’s _Herodotus_, ed. 1862, vol. II.
p. 283, § 17.
Footnote 177:
_Die quinäre und vigesimale Zählmethode_, Halle 1867.
Footnote 178:
Waitz, _l. c_. II. p. 224, compared with Bastian, _Geographische und
ethnologische Bilder_, Jena 1874, pp. 144, 155.
Footnote 179:
See on this J. Muir, _Contributions to a Knowledge of the Vedic
Theogon and Mythology_ (_Journal of Royal Asiatic Society_, N.S.,
1864, I. pp. 54–58).
Footnote 180:
Max Müller, _Lectures on the Science of Language_, Second Series, p.
430.
Footnote 181:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account