Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliabilityHulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
History
Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliability
Hulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
Animals, Mythical; Monsters; Science -- History; Zoology -- History
In the account of the Creation the forming of the whale is specially
dwelt upon: “And God created great whales and every living creature that
moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly after their kind.”
Luther, commenting on this, says that the creation of whales is specified
by name, lest affrighted with their greatness we should believe them to
be only visions or fancies. Though later commentators have decided that
the leviathan of the Bible is the crocodile, it was long held to be the
whale. Milton, in the first book of the “Paradise Lost,” writes of that
sea beast—
“Leviathan, which God of all his works
Created hugest that swim the ocean stream,”
and the Jews had a legend that the first whales were so immense in bulk,
so formidable in attack, so voracious, that there was considerable risk
of their overtoppling the rest of creation; so while as yet there were
but two of them in existence, one was destroyed in order that the race
might not be continued and the general balance of Nature upset.
Our ancestors found apt moral against the scornful in the reason assigned
for the mouth of the flounder being on one side. It appears that at one
time the flounder’s mouth was as fair to see as any other, but that it
lost all its beauty through contemptuous flouting of the herring, and it
has borne this evil mark of its jealousy ever since, and will probably
so bear it to the end of time. At the vague date known as once upon a
time we are told that all the fishes of the sea assembled to choose a
king, and that the herring was elected to this dignified position. The
flounder, on account of his red spots and other features that were
evidently more appreciated by himself than by the main body of electors,
had strong hope that he should himself be chosen, and the unlovely
grimace with which he saluted his sovereign was, as a judgment upon him,
made a fixture for all time as a punishment to himself and a warning to
others.
The tench was commonly called the physician, for it was believed by our
forefathers that when the other fish were in any way hurt and required
the aid of surgeon or physician, they healed themselves by rubbing
against the tench, finding the slime of his body to be a “soveraigne
salve” for their needs. For the sufferings of humanity the beasts,
birds, and plants appear to have supplied a sufficient materia medica,
and the less accessible creatures of the waters were but rarely pressed
into the mediæval pharmacopœia. The blood of the eel was rubbed upon
unwelcome warts, and a cruel remedy for bad eyes, the cruelty being, as
we have seen over and over again in those old remedies, by no means an
exceptional feature, was to capture a crab alive, cut out its eyes and
then let it go.[135] The eyes were then bound upon the neck of the man,
woman, or child, and a satisfactory result was speedily anticipated,
though very possibly not so speedily forthcoming.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account