Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliabilityHulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
History
Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliability
Hulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
Animals, Mythical; Monsters; Science -- History; Zoology -- History
The “Bestiare Divin” of Guillaume, a Norman priest, is a very good
example of the attempts that were made by the ecclesiastics to show that
all the works of Nature were symbols and teachers of great Divine truths.
The MS. of Guillaume dates from the thirteenth century, and is at present
preserved in the National Library in Paris. The work has been very well
reproduced in a French dress by Hippeau, a compatriot of the author
of it. The statements of the compiler of such a book as the one under
consideration are essentially unreliable, since it was very difficult for
him to ascertain the truth, and he had in addition no great desire to be
literally exact, and was at any moment prepared to sacrifice the actual
facts for what he would consider a higher stratum of truth. He could
not be accurate if he would, and would not if he could. Hence Hippeau,
in estimating the value of the book, very justly says: “N’oublions pas
que les pères de l’Eglise se préoccupèrent toujours beaucoup plus de la
pureté des doctrines qu’ils avaient à développer, que de l’exactitude
scientifique des notions sur lesquelles ils les appuyaient;” and we have
already seen that Augustine considered the significance that could be
wrung out of a statement of very much more importance than any adherence
to the facts of the case. “Dans la vaste étendue des Cieux, au sien des
mers profondes, sur tous les points du globe terrestre, il n’est par un
phénomène, pas une étoile, pas un quadrupède, pas un oiseau, pas une
plante, pas une pierre, qui n’éveille quelque souvenir biblique, qui
ne fournisse la matière d’un enseignement moral, qui ne donne lieu à
quelqu’effusion du cœur, qui n’ait à révéler quelque secret de Dieu.”
It is evident that whatever of value or interest may be evolved on the
strength of such sentiments, the result can hardly be called natural
history—a decision that we have already arrived at in our consideration
of the “Speculum Mundi.”
The “Bestiary” of De Thaun is a book of like nature. Only one copy of the
MS. is known, that in the Cottonian collection. Of another of his books,
the “Livre des Creatures,” seven copies are extant. The author had as
his great patron Adelaide of Louvain, the second queen of Henry I. of
England, and to her he dedicated his books. The language in which they
are written is very archaic, but an excellent reproduction of the book
for English readers has been made by Thomas Wright, F.S.A. We give six
lines as an illustration of the original MS., and of its rendering into
the rugged English that best gives its character:—
“En un livre divin, que apelum Genesim,
Iloc lisant truvum que Dés fist par raisun
Le soleil e la lune, e estoile chescune.
Pur cel me plaist à dire, d’ico est ma materie,
Que demusterai e à clers e à lai,
Chi grant busuin en unt, e pur mei perierunt.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account