Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition. — John Shaqi
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
Creator—happiness for His creatures—is here most fully accomplished.
And when we contemplate the history of this continent, and compare the
character of the early colonists, their history, and their influence
over the present condition of things, it will be found that they
remained stationary in exact proportion as they clung to the ideas and
habitudes of the Old World; or advanced towards a better and higher
condition just as they cast off these influences, and lived in natural
accord with the circumstances that surrounded them. The Spanish
conquerors were often the pets and favorites of the court, and always
the faithful sons of the Church, and brought with them the pomps and
vanities of the former, and the rigid ecclesiastical observances of the
latter. When Cortez and Pizzaro took possession of a province, they
pompously paraded the titles and dignities of the emperor before the
wondering savages, and added vast multitudes of “Christian converts” to
“Holy Church” with a zeal and fervor that the Beechers and Cheevers of
our times might envy, but surely could not equal. The English colonists,
on the contrary, were almost all disaffected, or at all events, were
charged with disaffection to the mother country. This, it is true, was
masked under religious beliefs and scruples of conscience, but was none
the less hostile to the political order under which they had been
persecuted and suffered so long. As soon, therefore, as they found
themselves in a New World, and relieved from the tyranny of the Old,
they abandoned, to a great extent, the forms, as they already had
abandoned many of the ideas, of the latter. They recognized the nominal
sovereignty of the mother country, or rather of the Crown; but from the
landing at Jamestown, as well as at Plymouth, all the British colonists
really governed themselves, made their own laws, provided for their own
safety, and, except the governor, and occasionally some subordinate
officials, elected their own rulers. The result was a corresponding
prosperity; for not only did the discipline of self-reliance strengthen
the character, and call out a higher phase of citizenship among the
English colonists, but in casting off the habitudes of the old
societies, and adopting those that were suited to the circumstances
surrounding them, they soon exhibited a striking contrast to those of
Spain and of other European powers, who clung to the ideas and habits of
Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account