Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
elaborate and mighty array of fact, of learned and imposing authority
appealed to, and the fatiguing if not unwarrantable argument put
forward, made it, and still make it difficult to reply to them or to
disprove their assumptions. Any question, no matter what its nature, or
however deficient in the elements of truth, still admits of argument,
and falsehood may often lead astray the reason even when the judgment
itself is convinced to the contrary. And these European advocates of the
dogma of a single race have such a boundless field for discussion, can
so bewilder and fatigue the reason as well as pervert the imagination by
their plausible arguments, drawn from the analysis of animal life, that
it is not wonderful they should lead astray the popular mind; nor is it
surprising that those among us claiming to be men of science should bow
to their authority, for though common sense rejects their arguments,
there are few of sufficient mental independence to withstand that
authority, when backed up by such an imposing array of distinguished
names. But the strong common sense that distinguishes our people will
not be, indeed, cannot be, deceived on this subject. The American or the
Southern knows that the Negro is a Negro, and is not a Caucasian, just
as clearly, absolutely and unmistakably as he knows that black is black
and is not white, that a man is a man and is not a woman—that a pigeon
is a pigeon and is not a robin—or a shad a shad and not a salmon. He
sees negro parents have negro offspring; that Indians have Indian
offspring; and that whites have white offspring, “each after its kind,”
with the same regularity, uniformity and perfect certainty that is
witnessed in all other forms of existence. There is not a white man or
woman in the Union who, if told of such a thing as white parents with
negro offspring, or negroes with white offspring, would believe it, even
if sworn to by a million of witnesses. Such a belief or such a
conception would be as monstrous, and indeed impossible, as to suppose
that robins had begotten pigeons or horses asses. And the constant
witnessing of this—this undeviating and perpetual order in the economy
of animal life, demonstrates the specific character of the Negro beyond
doubt or possible mistake. Irishmen, Germans, Frenchmen, etc., come
here, settle down, become citizens, and their offspring born and raised
on American soil differ in no appreciable or perceptible manner from
other Americans. But Negroes may have been brought here three centuries
ago, and their offspring of to-day is exactly as it was then, as
absolutely and specifically unlike the American as when the race first
touched the soil and first breathed the air of the New World. It is not
intended, as already observed, to argue this matter, for it is a
palpable and unavoidable fact that Negroes are a separate species; and
though in succeeding chapters of this work the specific qualities are
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account