NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to YouRothman, David H.
General
NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to You
Rothman, David H.
Internet
Just as important, however, the _N & O_ faced strong competition for
advertisers and readers. Yes, the Net shrank distances and gave smaller
companies some new marketing opportunities. But as shown by Time
Warner’s giant electronic newsstand, it could also create some good
synergies for media conglomerates offering package deals to national
advertisers. In certain respects—hardly all—readers also benefited. I
could key in “Carly Simon,” for example, and see any stories that might
have appeared about her, not only in _Time_ but also in _Entertainment
Weekly_ or _People_. Frank Daniels could bring together wire service
news and offbeat items from technical publications and others. But in
the future he couldn’t match the brand appeal of corporations such as
Time Warner.
Daniels had a right to be proud of his technological accomplishments, of
course. But from now on, assuming that he stayed, as he apparently would
for the moment, he would be an employee rather than a member of the
owning family. Forget the Third Wave talk of Net saving us all from
conglomerates. We could all have our own home pages on the World Wide
Web, of course, and maybe put out little magazines; and IUMA-style
startups could always use the new technology to startle the Goliaths—and
in the end, exceptions notwithstanding, the Internet did foster
diversity. Clearly, though, it was far from an all-purpose savior for
the _N & O_s of the world. However powerful in North Carolina, the
Raleigh newspaper was hardly on an equal footing when it competed
against the very largest media organizations.
As if to underscore that point, eight huge newspaper publishers had
banded together earlier that spring to form New Century Network, a club
for the big boys on the Net. Some people wondered if the giants might
lose out in the end—readers wanted to tour the Web themselves, not just
confine themselves to material favored by newspaper coalitions. And
maybe New Century wouldn’t end up so exclusive after all. Also,
advertisers might prefer to sprinkle their cash around the Web rather
than focus it on newspaper chains—they could pay for links to their
pages from many sites without much ado. The natural economies of the Net
might yet win out over the business plans of the giants. Still, for the
moment, publishers such as Gannett and the Washington Post Company were
apparently setting the tone of New Century itself. The 185 New Century
papers claimed more than 23 million paying readers.
“New Century might raise antitrust questions,” wrote Rory O’Connor, a
reporter for the _San Jose Mercury News_, part of Knight-Ridder, a chain
in New Century. Peter Winter, interim chief executive of New Century,
said the publishers were “comfortable with our conformance to antitrust
statutes.”[4.31]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account