nor do I believe that the common opinion could ever have arisen had it not been for the rage that exists for connecting every disease with a special diathesis which the profession flatters itself that it understands. Few persons have taken more pains than myself to ascertain the frequency with which neuralgic patients show a history of previous rheumatism, whether in the so-called "fibrous," or in the synovial form; but it is remarkable how seldom I have found this to be the case--a result which surprised me, because it happened that I, a neuralgic subject, had suffered in youth from regular acute rheumatism, and had fancied that I should discover a close connection between rheumatism and neuralgia. Eulenburg states that neuralgia caused by cold more frequently attacks the sciatic nerve than any other, and thinks that the tendency to sciatica is characteristic of the relations of rheumatism to sensory nerves. For my own part, I see no reason to call in the rheumatic diathesis as a _deus ex machina_ to explain the frequency with which sciatica follows comparatively trifling peripheral impressions like that of cold. The true reason I believe to be, that what would have been a slight and trivial neuralgia elsewhere, becomes a serious affection in the instance of the sciatic nerve, by reason of the strong muscular pressure end dragging which are always going on in the thigh in locomotion. I shall return to this subject when speaking of Treatment. As regards the relations, of gout to neuralgia, I can hardly express my own view better than by quoting the words of Eulenburg:[17] "Much more doubtful is the influence of gout, which in rare cases, perhaps, produces neuralgia directly, by means of neuritis, or by the deposit of tophus-like calcareous concretions in the nerve-trunks. Gout has been reckoned as a great influence among the causes of superficial neuralgias (sciatica), and also of visceral neuralgia (angina pectoris, etc.,) but this influence is more probably only an indirect one, operating through circulation changes which are often produced by chronic liver-diseases or by diseases of the heart and vessels, (_e. g._ Valvular diseases and narrowing of the coronary arteries in angina)." To which I will add this argument against any close connection of gout with neuralgia, that it is exceedingly seldom that colchicum effects any decided good, a fact which is as unlike the relations of colchicum to true gout as any thing could be. For, whatever may be thought of the advantages or disadvantages, on the whole, of employing colchicum against gout, at least no one with any experience will deny that in the immense majority of cases of true gouty pain, it gives rapid relief to the acute suffering. I doubt if it ever[18] acts in that way in real neuralgia, though I have occasionally seen it apparently useful in a more limited way, as will be said hereafter.