The writer in "Science Gossip" has taken the irregular motions in the
nebula as made to his hand, and has come to the same conclusion as we
have, namely, that they would all resolve themselves into motion in one
direction only, always subject to the general attraction towards the
centre of gravity of the nebula, which means motion round a centre,
perhaps not necessarily rotary motion. However, the only difference
between his ideas and ours is that we deal with a hollow nebular shell,
in which, it will be acknowledged, it would be much more easy for the
law of attraction to produce marked and distinct motions of any kind,
and which would lead to one motion in one direction throughout, than
in a nebula homogeneous, or nearly so, from the surface to the centre.
Whether it would lead to the formation of an oblate spheroid is another
question, as that might depend on a variety of circumstances, one or
more of which we shall have to touch later on; in fact, we have already
shown how the very reverse might be the case.
CHAPTER XVI.
PAGE
282 The sun's neighbours still exercise their attraction over him.
283 Regions of greatest density in the 9 nebulæ dealt with; compared
with the orbits of the planets made from them.
287 Results of comparison favourable to the theory.
289 Differences of size in the planets have arisen from variations
in the quantity of matter accumulating on the nebulæ.
290 Causes of the retrograde motions in Neptune, Uranus, and
their satellites.
292 Probable causes of the anomalous position of Neptune.
293 Rises and falls in the densities and dimensions of the
planets explained.
295 The form of the nebulæ must have resembled a dumb-bell.
296 More about rises and falls in densities.
297 Reason why the Asteroid nebula was the least dense of the system.
298 Not necessary to revise the dimensions given to the 9 nebulæ.
299 Causes of the anomalies in the dimensions, densities, etc.,
of the Earth and Venus.
299 The strictly spherical form of the sun accounted for.
But it may yet be varied.
300 Repetition that a spherical body could not be made from a
lens-shaped nebula by attraction and condensation.
TESTING THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE HOLLOW SPHERE THEORY. RETROGRADE
MOTIONS, POSITIONS, DENSITIES, MASSES, ETC. ETC., CONSIDERED.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account