Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
middle of the third century of Rome, more than three hundred years
after her own foundation, that Carthage made her appearance as a power.
The earlier times are shrouded in impenetrable darkness. Justin gives
some notices from Trogus, but most carelessly; so does also Diodorus,
who in all likelihood borrowed from Timæus: the former has an account
of a civil war, and of a conquest of Carthage by Malcus, one of its
generals. Certain it is, that Carthage for a long time paid tribute
to the Libyans; and the first sign of its vigour, is the throwing off
of this yoke in a hard-fought struggle. Particularly favourable to
Carthage seem to have been the fortunes of the mother country Phœnicia,
which, after having long and painfully striven against Egypt, yielded
itself to Persian protection; for though indeed its condition was thus
tolerable enough, yet at times a foreign yoke was felt to be galling,
and many may have then emigrated to the free colony, which was made
to thrive the more, as Tyre, owing to its connexion with Persia, now
became the port for the whole of Asia, even as far as India. The treaty
with Rome in the year of the city 245, shows that the Carthaginians
were then already masters of part of Sicily, of Sardinia, and of Libya,
so that they were a great people for that age. About the year 272, they
are said to have come over with an army of 300,000 men into Sicily,
against Gelon of Syracuse and Theron of Agrigentum: this, however, is
not real history. Pindar and Simonides sang the achievements of Gelon
and Theron; but history was not yet written. It is not that such an
expedition has never taken place; what is doubtful, is the assertion
that it happened at the same time as the invasion of Xerxes. The battle
of Himera is said to have been fought on the very day that he was
defeated at Salamis; but, on the other hand, the better chronological
statements which rest upon the authority of Timæus, show that Gelon,
who is supposed to have conquered at Himera, came to the throne at a
later date than that of the battle of Salamis. The expedition of the
Carthaginians must have happened in the 76th, or 77th Olympiad, and
it must have been insignificant. They were beaten, and did not for a
long time think again of undertaking anything against Sicily: they now
strengthened themselves in other quarters. When the Athenians engaged
in their enterprise against Sicily, we hear little or nothing of the
Carthaginians; they were confined to Motye, Panormus, and Solois, the
first of which three places is a Phœnician settlement. Yet when the
expedition had come to such an unhappy end, the implacable revenge
wreaked against Segesta and the other cities which had welcomed the
Athenians, now brought on the ruin of Sicily. These cities applied to
Carthage, which sent a considerable army over (350): all the Greek
towns were involved in the greatest danger; Selinus, Agrigentum,
Camarina, Gela, and other places were destroyed. Dionysius the elder
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account