Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
There was then a host of distinguished writers and men of genius; and
though of some of them we know but little, they are not for that the
less eminent. I do not, however, mean to say that all who at that time
were remarkable in literature, are to be reckoned among the classical
writers; some of them, especially the older contemporaries of Cicero,
are quite in the spirit of the earlier age: thus among us, Winkelmann,
as to his style, belongs to the period before Lessing. So likewise
Varro, who for his immense learning and reading in Roman matters—in what
was Greek, this may not have been so great—had such a high renown, is,
in all that is left of him, not at all like one who lived in the same
age with Cicero: he is as strong a contrast to him as Mascov, Mosheim,
and Reimarus were to Lessing. Nigidius Figulus also was very likely a
writer of the same kind. The real bloom of Roman literature consisted of
men who were younger than Cicero, and whom he beheld springing up around
him. One of these was the orator M. Cælius Rufus, whom we may still
judge of even from his letters: his language was like that of Cicero for
excellence. Curio’s letters do not make the same impression upon me: yet
they are not of importance enough for one to be able to give a positive
opinion about them, and I would rather trust Cicero’s own judgment, who
assigns him a very high rank. C. Licinius Calvus, a contemporary of
both, was an orator and a poet as well: him also Cicero greatly
esteemed; and if Quintilian does not think favourably of him, Tacitus,
on the other hand, says that he really had talent as an orator.[30] He
died young. Sallust was considerably younger than Cicero, and of the
same age with Cælius, Calvus, and Curio: he went his own way, living in
the past, and the language and style of his contemporaries remained
foreign to him. As he was not conversant with the language as it was
spoken, it is no wonder that his style has quite a different air from
what we find in theirs: as an historian, he is all that one could wish.
That Priscian charges some of those men with archaisms, is nothing at
all against them.[31]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account