Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
This full bloom of poetry fades away at the time of Cæsar and Cicero’s
death, and a new generation takes the place of the old one. Few eloquent
men of that period survive; Asinius Pollio, for example, who when Cæsar
died, was about thirty-four years of age, and therefore had already
formed his mind. As a writer, however, he belongs to a somewhat later
date, after the war of Brundusium; for it was not till then that he had
completely retired from public life. From the fragments of him in Seneca
the father, we may gather that his style was very unequal, but that he
sometimes could write very well, especially when impelled by passion; as
he did with justice against the Pompeians, and with great injustice
against Cicero. His was a soured and embittered nature, without any
kindly feelings. Another skilful orator was Munatius Plancus. Hirtius
indeed still belongs to the former age, but is not the less excellent:
he is a most elegant writer, although his whole life was spent in the
midst of arms. Asinius Pollio is the connecting link between the two
generations (which might be called _proventus_,[33] φορά); just as
Lessing is between Klopstock, Winkelmann, Kant, Kästner, Gellert,
Cramer, on the one side, and Göthe, Voss, Friederich Leopold von
Stolberg on the other, not reacting upon those who were older than
himself, but paving the way for the rising generation. Thus Asinius
stands between the time of Cicero and Virgil; for the latter may indeed
be mentioned as his contemporary.
It is a very just remark, that it is incorrect to speak, as we do in
Germany, of the Augustean age; we ought only to call it the Augustan
age, Αὐγούστειοι being met with in Greek authors[34] only. Except in the
case of Livy, prose had entirely fallen off: besides him, there was only
Messalla, of whom, however, nothing is left to us. And the cause of this
lay in the state of things at that time, as is shown by Tacitus in his
excellent _Dialogus de Oratoribus_. Prose was in times of old always
developed by oratory; it was poor as soon as people ceased to speak in
public. For this, however, there was no more a free opportunity: the
_rostra_ were dumb, the _curia_ was hushed, and if there were still any
speeches, they were only λόγοι ἐπιδεικτικοί,—dismal signs of the times!
The only field therefore for prose was history, which was written by
Asinius Pollio and Livy: Valerius Messalla alone, who was much older
than Asinius, and about the same standing as Virgil, was of any
importance as an orator. It may also be that he was more remarkable for
his nobleness of mind and his personal excellence, than for
extraordinary talent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account