Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
With the next year, Cæsar’s proconsulship was to expire. He now, after a
lapse of ten years, stood for a second consulship, and asked for a
triumph beforehand; so that he might keep his army together, and disband
it when that was over, as Pompey had done after the war with
Mithridates. He wanted to be allowed to become a candidate at the
consular election while still in his province,—an irregularity which had
crept in during the seventh century,—and then to lead his army to Rome,
and triumph. To prevent such a thing, it had been the rule, we do not
know for how long, that no one who had an army should stand for the
consulship. His opponents therefore demanded that he should lay down the
_imperium_; disband his troops, that is to say, give up his triumph; and
stand for the consulship as a private person. Had he thus delivered
himself into the hands of his enemies, he was convinced that he would
have lost his life. Curio now moved that Cæsar and Pompey should both
disband their troops, and come to Rome as private persons; which was the
fairest proposal. But the friends of Pompey maintained that, as the term
of his _imperium_ was not yet come to an end, he ought not to be placed
on an equal footing with Cæsar. It was the misfortune of Italy that
Pompey, who was dangerously ill, did not then die: he was indeed so
popular, or so dreaded, that all Italy prayed for his recovery. Pompey
seemingly was ready to submit to the humiliation, though indeed he
complained bitterly of the slight put upon him. Curio’s motion was
carried by a majority of three hundred against about twenty;[11] but the
consul Marcellus cancelled the decree. The aristocrats of that day
professed to uphold the decrees of the senate, whereas in reality they
wanted to rule the senate with a rod of iron; and so they did not even
scorn the help of the rabble, being in every sense of the word
_populaciers_, if it suited their ends: they would raise an outcry
against rebellion, and yet they were the rankest revolutionists, if
matters did not go on quite as they wished. Thus the party of Lamennais,
as soon as the government does anything that they dislike, at once begin
to preach regicide and revolution. I have heard men of the extreme right
in France talking like Jacobins, uttering it as their opinion that the
people of the very lowest class were gifted with an immense deal of
sense, and that they showed the highest interest in the welfare of the
country. Curio also did not make his proposal from any good motive: this
he cannot have credit for, being one of those to whom the worst
confusion is the most welcome state of things.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3) — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account