Notes and Queries, Number 137, June 12, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 137, June 12, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
Smith, _Bedæ Hist. Eccl._, p. 351.); and another far-famed countryman
of ours, Alcuin, who, in some verses which he composed for being placed "Ad
aram SS. Patricii et aliorum Scotorum," says:
"Patricius, Cheranus, Scotorum gloria gentis,
Atque Columbanus, Congallus, Adomnanus atque," &c.
_Opp._ ed. Frobenio, t. ii. p. 219.
10th. A liturgical MS. in the British Museum, Nero, A, II. fo. 35. b.,
which was first printed by Spelman, who calls it "codex vetustissimus"
(_Concil._, i. 176.), speaks of St. Patrick as "archiepiscopus in Scotiis
et Britanniis" (_Ib._, 177.). 11th. The celebrated monastery of St. Gall
(an Irish saint) still possesses the fragment of what was once a missal,
and written in the Irish character. This codex must have been older than
the ninth century, for it is set down "inter libros Scottice scriptos" in a
catalogue of the books belonging to that library, made in the ninth
century. Among the saints enumerated in the canon of the mass is Patrick
the bishop, "intercedentibus pro nobis beatis apostolis Petro et Paulo et
Patricio æpiscopo" (see the fragment in _Appendix A to Cooper's Report_, p.
95.).
PYRRHO has had, and is likely always to have, followers in every age and
country: Hardouin would not allow that Virgil ever lived, but stoutly held
that the _Æneid_ was "a fardel of monkish fictions" put together during the
middle ages: not "the bigoted Anglo-Saxons" of the eighth, but Dr. Ledwich
of the eighteenth century, denied the existence of the great St. Patrick; a
few weeks ago a correspondent of "N. & Q." asked "Is not the battle itself
(of Waterloo) a myth?" (Vol. v., p. 396.); and last week, another tells us
that "the saint (Patrick) certainly vanishes into 'an airy nothing,' if we
are to credit the above authors" (Dr. Ledwich and Dr. Aikin).
Who the Aikin may be, or what the work of his which E. M. R. has brought
forwards, I do not know; Ledwich's book now lies before me, and a more
prejudiced writer I have never met with. I think, however, that from the
above authorities it is clearly shown that, together with all the most
learned of early and modern times, we are still warranted in treating St.
Patrick "as a real actor in Irish ecclesiastical affairs."
D. ROCK.
Buckland.
_Sir James Ware--St. Patrick's Birth-place_ (Vol. v., p. 520.)--Permit me
to correct your correspondent E. M. R., who, by a strange mistake, calls
Sir James Ware "a Roman Catholic writer." He was a zealous member of the
church of Ireland: E. M. R. will see a memoir of him in Harris's edition of
Ware's _Writers of Ireland_.
With respect to the birth-place of St. Patrick, your correspondent may
consult Colgan's _Trias Thaumaturga, Append. quinta ad vitas S. Patricii_,
{562} cap. ii. p. 221. et seq.; also the Life of St. Patrick by Harris in
his edition of Ware's _Bishops of Ireland_; and Dr. Lanigan's
_Ecclesiastical History of Ireland_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account