Notes and Queries, Number 137, June 12, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 137, June 12, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
There can, I think, be little doubt but that Sir W. Tyrrel's was the hand
that drew the bow; whether, however, he intended to kill the king or not,
is a point which it is probable, after the time that has elapsed, will
never be satisfactorily determined.
R. C. C.
Oxon.
{571}
_Sir Gilbert Gerrard_ (Vol. v., p. 511.).--I beg to refer MR. SPEDDING to
Erdeswick's _Staffordshire_, by Harwood (1820), p. 83., who states that Sir
Gilbert Gerrard died in 1592, and that he was buried in Ashley churchyard
in that county, under a handsome monument. Probably the inscription on it
will give the precise date, and some of your readers may be able to refer
to it, and send the communication to "N. & Q." His death must have occurred
between January 8, 1592, 34 Elizabeth, the date of his will as given in
Dugdale's _Baronage_, vol. ii. p. 417., and the following April; if Dugdale
is right in saying that it was then proved. But on referring to the _Baga
de Secretis_, the contents of which are so excellently calendared by Sir
Francis Palgrave in the Appendices to his third, fourth, and fifth reports
as deputy-keeper of the Public Records, it appears that Sir Gilbert was
named in a commission of Oyer and Terminer, on March 22; that he signed a
precept under it for the return of the grand jury, on April 11; and that he
signed another precept to the lieutenant of the Tower for bringing up Sir
John Perrott before the justices, on _June 12_, all in 34 Elizabeth, 1592.
(Fourth Report, Appendix II. pp. 282, 283.) It would seem, therefore, that
Dugdale has erred in the date he assigns to the probate of Sir Gilbert's
will. A search, however, at Doctors' Commons will solve the difficulty.
Edward Foss.
_Fides Carbonarii_ (Vol. iv., pp. 233. 283.; Vol. v., p. 523.).--The
Collier's Confession of Faith did not originate with Dr. Milner, but is at
least three hundred years old. Cardinal Hosius commends it highly (_De
auctor. sacræ Script._: Opp. fol. 263.: Antverp. 1556), and so does
Staphylus likewise (_Apologia_, fol. 83.: Colon. 1562). Bellarmin gives
another version of the narrative, which he has taken from Petrus Barocius
(_De arte bene moriendi_, lib. ii. cap. ix. pp. 200-203.: Antverp. 1620).
Your correspondents should not have forgotten the concluding question and
answer in what Crakenthorp has styled "The Colliar's Catechisme" (_Vigilius
Dormitans_, p. 187.: Lond. 1631). The entire of the conversation may be
represented thus:
"What do you believe?"
"I believe what the Church believes."
"And what does the Church believe?"
"The Church believes what I believe."
"And what do you both believe?"
"The same thing."
R. G.
_Line on Franklin_ (Vol. iv., p. 443.; Vol. v., pp. 17. 549.).--
"Eripuit Jovi fulmen, sceptrumque tyrannis."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account