Since I sent you a hasty Note respecting the Old Market Cross at Bury St. Edmunds, with reference to your correspondent's Query, I bethought me of the old market cross which formerly stood in the Great Market Place at Norwich. Blomefield, in his _History of Norfolk_, vol. ii. p. 652., gives an account of that ancient cross, which is too long to quote but he states that "it was a neat _octagonal_ building, with steps round it, and an _oratory or chapel in it_, with a chamber over it." Now possibly there might have been such a "chapel" in the old cross at Bury, wherein "Henry Gage was married in 1655;" for I put faith in all that Mr. Rookwood Gage said or wrote. There is still standing, at Wymondham in Norfolk, an old wooden market cross, with a chamber over it, supported by wooden columns: it is an octagon building. Blomefield makes no mention of it. An etching was published of this cross, by -- Dixon, of Norwich, some few years back. J. B. * * * * * Replies to Minor Queries. _The two Gilberts de Clare_ (Vol. v., p. 439.).--In reference to No. 2. of "Irish Queries", as to the relationship which existed between the two Gilberts de Clare, Earls of Gloucester, I beg to send you the information required by your correspondent MAC AN BHAIRD. Gilbertus Co. Gloucest. = Isabella, tertia natu filiarium & Hertf.: | & cohær. Will. Mareschalli obiit 14 Henr. 3. | Co. Pembr. | +-------------------+ | Ricardus, Co. Gloucest. = Matilda, filia Joh. de Laci & Hertf.: | Comit. Lincoln ux. 2. obiit 46 Henr. 3. | | +-------------------+ | Gilbertus, Comes = Joanna de Acres, filia Regis Glouc. & Hertf. | Ed. 1. cogn. Rufus, ob. | 24 Ed. 1. /|\ Dugdale's _Baronage_, i. 209. See also Miller's _Catalogue of Honor_, pp. 369-373.; Vincent's _Errours of Brooke_, pp. 122, 123.; Yorke's _Union of Honour_, pp. 109, 110. FARNHAM. Farnham, Cavan. _Baxter's Shove, &c._ (Vol. v., p. 416.).--I fear it may savour somewhat of presumption in me to offer the following remarks to one who confesses himself to be a collector of Baxter's works; but if they afford no information to your correspondent MR. CLARK, they may probably prove acceptable to other less sedulous inquirers after the writings of this truly pious man.