Notes and Queries, Number 178, March 26, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 178, March 26, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"He (the modern politician) believes a man's words and his meanings
should never agree together: for he that says what he thinks lays
himself open to be expounded by the most ignorant; and _he who does not
make his words rather serve to conceal than discover the sense of his
heart_, deserves to have it pulled out, like a traitor's, and shown
publicly to the rabble."
Young has the thought in the following couplet on the duplicity of courts:
"When Nature's end of language is declin'd,
And men talk only to _conceal their mind_."
From Young it passed to Voltaire, who in the dialogue entitled "Le Chapon
et la Poularde," makes the former say of the treachery of men:
"Ils n'emploient les paroles que pour _déguiser leurs pensées_."
Goldsmith, about the same time, in his paper in _The Bee_, produces it in
the well-known words:
"Men who know the world hold that the true use of speech is not so much
to _express_ our wants, as to _conceal_ them."
Then comes Talleyrand, who is reported to have said:
"La parole n'a été donnée à l'homme que pour _déguiser sa pensée_."
The latest writer who adopts this remark without acknowledgment is, I
believe, Lord Holland. In his _Life of Lope de Vega_ he says of certain
Spanish writers, promoters of the _cultismo_ style:
"These authors do not avail themselves of the invention of letters for
the purpose of _conveying, but of concealing, their ideas_."
From these passages (some of which have already appeared in Vol. i., p. 83)
it will be seen that the germ of the thought occurs in Jeremy Taylor; that
Lloyd and South improved upon it; that Butler, Young and Goldsmith repeated
it; that Voltaire translated it into French; that Talleyrand echoed
Voltaire's words; and that it has now become so familiar an expression,
that any one may quote it, as Lord Holland has done, without being at the
trouble of giving his authority.
If, from the search for the author, we turn to consider the saying itself,
we shall find that its practical application extends not merely to every
species of equivocation, mental reservation, and even falsehood; but
comprises certain forms of speech, which are intended to convey the
_contrary_ of what they express. To this class of words the French have
given the designation of _contre-vérité_; and, to my surprise, I find that
they include therein the expression _amende honorable_. Upon this point the
_Grammaire des Grammaires_, by Girault Duvivier, has these remarks:
"La contre-vérité a beaucoup de rapport avec l'ironie. Amende
honorable, par exemple, est une contre-vérité, une vérité prise dans un
sens opposé à celui de son énonciation; car, au lieu d'être honorable,
elle est infamante, déshonorante."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account