Notes and Queries, Number 218, December 31, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, Number 218, December 31, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 218, December 31, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
Garter plates of Christian Duke of Brunswick (1625), Gustavus Adolphus
King of Sweden (1628), and Charles Count Palatine of the Rhine (1633
and 1680), they are full fronted with seven barrs.
"In Great Britain we have but four kinds of helmets, according to the
four different degrees in the state--the king, the nobility, knights,
and gentry. The sovereign helmet full fronted, having seven barrs or
guards, visure without any bever; the nobilities the same, but half
turned to the right, and usually showing four barrs; the knight's
helmet full fronted, with the bever turned up; and the gentleman's in
profile, the bever or visor close; using steel helmets for all as the
only proper metal for a helmet common to all. Foreigners condemn us for
attributing that helmet to a knight, which they give to a king; and
more proper, says Mackensie, for a king without guard-visure than for a
knight (_Science of Heraldry_, p. 87.), because knights are in danger,
and have less need to command. But it must be observed, the knight's
helmet has a visor, and no barrs; the sovereign's barrs, because no
visor. And this kind of helmet, with barrs instead of a visor, seems to
have been contrived for princes and great commanders, who would have
been incommoded by the visor, and too much exposed without anything,
therefore had barrs: whereas knights being, according to Mackensie, in
more danger and having less need to command, had their helmet for
action; and are represented with the bever up, ready to receive the
king or general's command. As to the resemblance of the one to the
other, both being in full front, the connexion was not anciently so
remote as seems at this day. Knighthood is the first and most ancient
military honour, and therefore at this day sovereign princes and
knights are the only two honours universally acknowledged. Knighthood
is the source of all honours, and of all military glory, and an honour
esteemed by and conferred upon kings; without which they were
heretofore thought incomplete, and could not confer that honour on
others, no more than ordination could be conferred by one unordained:
so that there was a very near connexion between sovereignty and
knighthood. And besides, the propriety of the open helmet with a visor
for a knight, and the helmet guard-visure for a king, the latter is
more ornamental, especially if, according to the modern practice, the
barrs are gold. As the king's helmet is without a visor, and barred, so
is that of the nobility in imitation of it, but turned to the right as
a proper distinction as, in like manner, that of the gentry differs
from the knights. As there are in fact but two orders of men, nobility
of which the king is the first degree, and gentry of which knights are
the first, so they are by this means sufficiently distinguished
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account