Notes and Queries, Number 218, December 31, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 218, December 31, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
according to their respective orders and degrees: the first order
distinguished by the barred helmet, the gentry by the visored helmet
with proper differences of the second degrees of each class from the
first; and all other distinctions more than this are unnecessary and
useless.
"The helmet does not seem to have been formerly used but in a military
way, and affairs of chivalry. I do not find any helmets upon the
monuments of our Kings of England, nor upon other ancient monuments,
nor upon any of the Great Seals, coins, or medals. Upon the plates of
the Knights of the Garter at Windsor, all degrees used the old profile
close helmet till about 1588, some few excepted; and soon after, the
helmet with barrs came into fashion, and was used for all degrees of
nobility, and it has continued ever since; and the same has been used
for all degrees of nobility upon the plates of the Knights of the Bath,
those that are knights only using a knight's helmet. And the same may
be observed in Sir Edward Walker's _Books of the Nobility from the
Restoration to the Revolution_, wherein all degrees have the helmet
turned towards the right, showing four barrs; the sovereign's being
full with seven barrs."
G.
* * * * *
HAMPDEN'S DEATH.
(Vol. viii., p. 495.)
"On the 21st of July, 1828, the corpse of John Hampden was disinterred by
the late Lord Nugent for the purpose of settling the disputed point of
history as to the manner in which the patriot received his death-wound. The
examination seems to have been conducted after a somewhat bungling fashion
for a scientific object, and the facts disclosed were these: 'On lifting up
the right arm we found that it was dispossessed of its hand. We might
therefore naturally conjecture that it had been amputated, as the bone
presented a perfectly flat appearance, as if sawn off by some sharp
instrument. On searching under the cloths, to our no small astonishment we
found the hand, or rather a number of small bones, inclosed in a separate
cloth. For about six inches up the arm the flesh had wasted away, being
evidently smaller than the lower part of the left arm, to which the hand
was very firmly united, and which presented no symptoms of decay further
than the two bones of the forefinger loose. Even the nails remained entire,
of which we saw no appearance in the cloth containing the remains of the
right hand.... The clavicle of the right shoulder was firmly united to the
scapula, nor did there appear any contusion or indentation that evinced
symptoms of any wound ever having been inflicted. The left shoulder, on the
contrary, was smaller and sunken in, as if the clavicle had been displaced.
To {647} remove all doubts, it was adjudged necessary to remove the arms,
which were amputated with a penknife (!). The socket of the left (_sic_)
arm was perfectly white and healthy, and the clavicle firmly united to the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account