Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 102, October 11, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 102, October 11, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
Spanish clergy relinquished at once, not other literature, but the most
elementary knowledge, for the sake of studying Arabic and Chaldee books?
And this is not alleged to have been for the purpose of converting Moors
and Jews, but as a literary pastime. They are expressly said to have
neglected the Scriptures. The object that I had in view was to show the
general ignorance of various nations in those ages and this charge of
ignorance, as to what lay most open to the Spanish clergy, would hardly
be alleviated, even if it were true, that some of them had taken to the
study of Arabic.
Another criticism in Vol. i., p. 435., relating to what I have said in
_Hist. of Literature_, vol. iii. p. 149. (1st edition), concerning
Campanella and Adami, is better founded, though your correspondent C. is
himself not wholly accurate. I have said of Tobias Adami, that he
"dedicated to the philosophers of Germany his own _Prodromus Philosophiæ
Instaurandæ_ (Instaur_atio_ is, of course, an error of the press),
prefixed to his edition of Campanella's _Compendium de Rerum Naturâ_,
published at Frankfort in 1617." C. says, "This _Prodromus_ is a
treatise of Campanella's, not, as Mr. Hallam says, of Adami. Adami
published the _Prodromus_ for Campanella, who was in prison; and he
wrote a preface, in which he gives a list of other writings of
Campanella, which he proposes to publish afterwards. What Mr. Hallam
calls an edition, was the first publication."
The words _Prodromus Philosophiæ Instaurandæ_, which appear only on the
title-page, are of Adami himself, not of Campanella. The work of the
latter is called _Compendium de Rerum Naturâ_, and is printed, after the
preface, with this running title. The error into which I fell was to
refer the words _Prodromus Philosophiæ Instaurandæ_ to the preface of
Adami, and not to the entire work. It may be satisfactory to give the
title-page, and one or two extracts from the preface:--
"Prodromus Philosophiæ Instaurandæ, id est, Dissertationis de
Natura rerum Compendium, secundum sera principia, ex scriptis
Thomæ Campanellæ præmissum, cum præfatione ad philosophos
Germaniæ. Francofurt. 1617."
_Prodromus_, of course, means the _avant-courier_ of a new philosophy;
and this, I might think, was intended for Adami himself. But, on looking
again at the preface, I perceive that it refers to the _Compendium_,
which was to lead the way to ulterior publications.
"Præmittere autem hoc saltem opusculum visum nobis est, quo brevis
ἀνακεφαλαίωσις physicorum philosophematum conjecta est,
ut judicia doctorum ex eo in Germania experiremur,
exercitaremusque. Cui si operæ pretium videbitur, subjungemus
posthac autoris pleniorem et concinniorem Epilogismum Philosophiæ
Naturalis, Moralis et Politicæ, addito opusculo Civitatis Solis,
quo idea ingeniosissima reipublicæ philosophiæ secundum naturam
instituendæ proponitur."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account