Observations on the Operation and Use of Mercury in the Venereal DiseaseDuncan, Andrew
History
Observations on the Operation and Use of Mercury in the Venereal Disease
Duncan, Andrew
Mercury -- Therapeutic use -- Early works to 1800; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Early works to 1800
Upon the whole, then, from what has been said of this theory of the
action of mercury in the cure of the _lues venerea_, it appears, that
the cure can by no means be referred to the evacuation. The different
arguments adduced in favour of that theory, we have endeavoured to shew,
either proceed on wrong principles, or, although admitted in their
greatest latitude, can afford no ground for any conclusion to support
it. Evacuation, from its nature, whether supposed to operate by
diminishing the quantity of circulating fluids, or by any change it can
induce in their quality, can scarce be conceived to be a cause adequate
to the cure of _lues venerea_. Evacuation does not produce a cure of the
venereal disease, when it takes place in an equal, or even in a much
greater degree, from the employment of other medicines, than when the
disease is effectually removed from the use of mercury. And, _lastly_,
the venereal disease is never more effectually cured by mercury, than
when it is evident, from every mark by which the degree of evacuation
can be determined, that the evacuation arising from it is least
considerable. It may, therefore, with confidence be asserted, that
mercury does not cure _lues venerea_ by evacuation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAP. III.
_Concerning the Opinion, that Mercury cures Lues Venerea, by acting as
an Antidote to the Venereal Matter._
IT is an undoubted fact, that mercury, by proper management, cures _lues
venerea_. From the arguments already adduced, it has been concluded,
that the cure, thus obtained, is not the consequence of evacuation.
Having rejected this prevalent opinion, then, it next remains to say, in
what manner a cure is produced.
It has long been an opinion, very generally received, that mercury is a
substance capable of destroying the venereal virus; or that, from being
united with this virus, possesses a power of rendering it inactive. Many
arguments tend to prove, that this is in reality the case; and that in
this manner it cures _lues venerea_. But, at the same time, this theory
is not to be considered as without difficulties. The first that occurs,
is, with regard to the mode in which an opportunity is afforded for a
mixture of the mercury with the virus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account