Ocellus Lucanus on the nature of the universe : $b Taurus, the Platonic philosopher, on the eternity of the world. Julius Firmicus Maternus of the thema mundi. Select theorems on the perpetuity of time, by Proclus.Proclus
Philosophy
Ocellus Lucanus on the nature of the universe : $b Taurus, the Platonic philosopher, on the eternity of the world. Julius Firmicus Maternus of the thema mundi. Select theorems on the perpetuity of time, by Proclus.
Proclus
Astrology -- Early works to 1800; Science -- Early works to 1800
Ocellus Lucanus has written what follows concerning the Nature of the
Universe; having learnt some things through clear arguments from Nature
herself, _but others from opinion, in conjunction with reason_[8], it
being his intention [in this work] to derive what is probable from
intellectual perception.
It appears, therefore, to me, that the Universe is indestructible and
unbegotten, since it always was, and always will be; for if it had a
temporal beginning, it would not have always existed: thus, therefore,
the universe is unbegotten and indestructible; for if some one should
opine that it was once generated, he would not be able to find anything
into which it can be corrupted and dissolved, since that from which it
was generated would be the first part of the universe; and again, that
into which it would be dissolved would be the last part of it.
But if the universe was generated, it was generated together with all
things; and if it should be corrupted, it would be corrupted together
with all things. This, however, is impossible[9]. The universe,
therefore, is without a beginning, and without an end; nor is it possible
that it can have any other mode of subsistence.
To which may be added, that everything which has received a beginning
of generation, and which ought also to participate of dissolution,
receives two mutations; one of which, indeed, proceeds from the less
to the greater, and from the worse to the better; and that from which
it begins to change is denominated generation, but that at which it at
length arrives, is called acme. The other mutation, however, proceeds
from the greater to the less, and from the better to the worse: but the
termination of this mutation is denominated corruption and dissolution.
If, therefore, the whole and the universe were generated, and are
corruptible, they must, when generated, have been changed from the less
to the greater, and from the worse to the better; but when corrupted,
they must be changed from the greater to the less, and from the better to
the worse. Hence, if the world was generated, it would receive increase,
and would arrive at its acme; and again, it would afterwards receive
decrease and an end. For every nature which has a progression, possesses
three boundaries and two intervals. The three boundaries, therefore, are
generation, acme, and end; but the intervals are, the progression from
generation to acme, and from acme to the end.
The whole, however, and the universe, affords, as from itself, no
indication of a thing of this kind; for neither do we perceive it rising
into existence, or becoming to be, nor changing to the better and the
greater, nor becoming at a certain time worse or less; but it always
continues to subsist in the same and a similar manner, and is itself
perpetually equal and similar to itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account