Georgia -- Antiquities; Mounds -- Georgia; Ocmulgee National Monument (Ga.)
Finally, smoking appears to have become so habitual that it may have
been released from the religious implications which everywhere seem to
accompany the use of tobacco in aboriginal America. Pipes in an
astonishing variety of skillfully executed shapes, principally of clay
but also in stone, have been found scattered throughout the village
refuse. Human heads with great goggle eyes, bird and animal heads, boats
(?), and a stylized representation of a hafted celt are common.
DeSoto probably encountered some distant towns of these people when he
explored Georgia in 1540, and they were undoubtedly the ancestors of
various historic Creek Indian tribes of this State. We have suggested
that their culture was a mixture of very old elements in the region,
such as complicated stamping, with newer ideas coming in with the Master
Farmers or even later, such as temple mounds and incised decoration. We
know from work in other areas that the Early Farmer bearers of the Swift
Creek tradition had continued their existence uninterrupted save only in
the immediate vicinity of Macon. Therefore, despite the admixture of
many outside influences, we see in the reappearance here of one of their
major cultural elements, the old paddled pottery surfaces, proof that
the basic culture and presumably the people themselves were still the
same. In effect, an actual reoccupation of the area seems indicated; and
it is this fact that the museum exhibits recognize in the name
“Reconquest” given to the period we are discussing.
The culture represented at the Lamar site just described, which is the
type site for this archeological period, covered a very wide
geographical range and lasted in some locales into the historic period.
Typical Lamar pottery is found on numerous sites in regions as widely
separated as Florida, Alabama, the Carolinas, and even parts of
Tennessee. We know that it was made by the historic Cherokee, which
accounts for the persistence of complicated stamping into historic times
mentioned earlier, and possibly also by some Siouan-speaking tribes in
the Carolinas, as well as by the early Creeks. While not all elements of
the culture were uniformly shared in all of these areas, there can be
little doubt that the material aspects of the lives of these different
groups were surprisingly much alike. This may appear the more remarkable
when one considers the difference in language and even the active
hostility of such historic tribes as the Creek and the Cherokee.
Nevertheless, one has only to consider the diversity of modern European
nations sharing a single culture which we know as “Western Civilization”
to realize that language, nationality, and culture are not mutually
interrelated on any one-to-one basis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account