Wentworth and Laud, with their associates, when they tried to govern on
such terms, were continually clashing with the people. A government thus
carried on naturally aroused resistance, which often itself took
unjustifiable forms; and this resistance was, in its turn, punished with
revolting brutality. Criticism of Laudian methods, or of existing social
habits, might take scurrilous shape; and then the critic’s ears were
hacked off as he stood in the pillory, or he was imprisoned for life.
[Illustration:
Archbishop Laud.
From the portrait at Lambeth Palace, painted by Vandyke.
By permission of the Archbishop of Canterbury.
]
The great fight was made, not on a religious, but on a purely political
question—that of Ship Money. The king wished to go to war with the
Dutch, and to raise his fleet he issued writs, first to the maritime
counties, and then to every shire in England. He consulted his judges,
who stated that his action was legal: as well they might, for when a
judge disagreed with him on any important point, he was promptly
dismissed from office. But there was one man in the kingdom who thought
differently, John Hampden, a Buckinghamshire ’squire, who had already
once sat as a silent member in Parliament, together with another equally
silent member of the same social standing, his nephew, Oliver Cromwell.
Hampden was assessed at twenty shillings. The amount was of no more
importance than the value of the tea which a century and a half later
was thrown into Boston Harbor; but in each case a vital principle—the
same vital principle—was involved. If the King could take twenty
shillings from Hampden without authority from the representatives of the
people in Parliament assembled, then his rule was absolute: he could do
what he pleased. On the other hand, if the House of Commons could do as
it wished in granting money only for whatever need it chose to recognize
in the kingdom, then the House of Commons was supreme. In Hampden’s view
but one course was possible—he was for the Parliament and the nation
against the King; and he refused to pay the sum, facing without a murmur
the punishment for his contumacy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account