Under modern conditions, in a great civilized state, the regular army is
composed of officers who have as a rule been carefully trained to their
work; who possess remarkably fine physique, and who are accustomed to
the command of men and to taking the lead in emergencies; and the
enlisted men have likewise been picked out with great care as to their
bodily development; have been drilled until they handle themselves,
their horses, and their weapons admirably, can cook for themselves, and
are trained to the endurance of hardship and exposure under the
conditions of march and battle. An ordinary volunteer or militia
regiment from an ordinary civilized community, on the other hand, no
matter how enthusiastic or patriotic, or how intelligent, is officered
by lawyers, merchants, business men, or their sons, and contains in its
ranks clerks, mechanics, or farmers’ lads of varying physique, who have
to be laboriously taught how to shoot and how to ride, and, above all,
how to cook and to take care of themselves and make themselves
comfortable in the open, especially when tired out by long marches, and
when the weather is bad. At the outset such a regiment is, of course,
utterly inferior to a veteran regular regiment, but after it has been in
active service in the field for a year or two, so that its weak men have
been weeded out, and its strong men have learned their duties—which can
be learned far more rapidly in time of war than in time of peace—it
becomes equal to any regiment. Moreover, if a regular regiment consists
of raw recruits and is officered by men who have learned their
profession only in the barracks and the study and on the parade ground,
it may be a cause of very disagreeable surprise to those who have grown
to regard the word “regular” as a kind of fetich.
Again, a volunteer regiment may have the wisdom to select officers for
the highest positions who know how to handle men, who have seen actual
soldiering, who possess natural capacity for leadership, eagerness to
learn, and the good sense to know their own shortcomings; and the rank
and file may be men of adventurous temper, already skilful riflemen, and
of great bodily hardihood, accustomed to exposure, accustomed to
cook—that is to say, to take care of their stomachs—to live in the open,
to endure hardship and fatigue, and to take advantage of cover in
battle. Such a regiment, especially if raised on the frontier, may, from
the outset, prove itself equal to or better than any ordinary regular
regiment—as has recently been shown by our troops in the Philippines, by
the Australians and Canadians in South Africa, and, above all, by the
Boers; and as was shown nearly a century ago by Hofer’s Tyrolese and
Andrew Jackson’s backwoodsmen. Of course, no good traits will avail in
the least if men are possessed with the belief that they cannot be
taught anything, if they are not eager to obey and to learn; or if they
do not possess a natural fighting edge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account