So it is with the men in high command. The careful training in body and
mind, and especially in character, gained in an academy like West Point,
and the subsequent experience in the field, endow the regular officer
with such advantages that, in any but a long war, he cannot be overtaken
even by the best natural fighter. In the American Civil War, for
instance, the greatest leaders were all West Pointers. Yet even there,
by the end of the contest both armies had produced regimental, brigade,
and division commanders, who though originally from civil life, had
learned to know their business exactly as well as the best regular
officers; and there was at least one such commander—Forrest—who, in his
own class, was unequalled. If in a war the regular officers prove to
have been trained merely to the pedantry of their profession, and do not
happen to number men of exceptional ability in their ranks, then sooner
or later the men who are born soldiers will come to the front, even
though they have been civilians until late in life.
None of the men on the Parliamentary side who had received their
training in the Continental armies amounted to much. On the Royalist
side the only professional soldier who made his mark was Rupert; and
Rupert, after a year or two, was decisively beaten by Cromwell—a great
natural military genius, who, although a civilian till after forty,
showed an astonishing aptitude in grasping the essentials of his new
profession. His only military rival in the war was Montrose, who was
also not a professional soldier.
[Illustration:
Prince Rupert.
From the portrait by Vandyke at Hinchingbrooke.
By permission of the Earl of Sandwich.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account