Other less common congenital deformities have been recorded, and amongst them may be noted a case lately seen by myself in a girl of four years, in whom there existed an oval opening at the junction of the hard and soft palate, separated by a narrow bridge of normal palatal tissue from a cleft of the posterior half of the velum and uvula, showing intermissions of development; a congenital aperture in the soft palate at its junction with the hard, or in any part of the velum, but with no defect of either uvula or palate bones (Dieffenbach[4]); a defective development of the palate bones alone, the mucous membrane remaining intact from side to side, and hence no cleft resulting (Trélat, Notta, Langenbeck); or again, as in Fig. 15, a cleft only of the anterior portion of the palate, extending through the alveolus, and for a short distance behind it (Mason[5]). Inasmuch as the union of the two halves of the velum occurs subsequently to that of the alveolar arch, it appears that this last rare defect must have been due to an intermission of development, which was felt only at the anterior portion, whilst that of the posterior part proceeded normally at a later date. Mason[6] records a curious case worth mentioning of a girl under his care in 1877, who had a fissure extending through the velum, and for a short distance into the hard palate, but there was no trace of uvula on either side, and the soft palate was continuous on both sides with the pharyngeal wall. The width of the cleft varies as much as the extent, and is a matter of great importance prognostically, as the broader clefts are much more difficult to close. The direction or slope of the segments of the bony palate also differs considerably, in some instances being more or less horizontal and following the normal curve; in others one or both of the segments is much more nearly vertical, a condition which is not at all unsatisfactory, for, as will be explained hereafter, the more horizontal the palatal processes, the more difficult is it to gain satisfactory closure by operation (p. 65). * * * * * The frequency of the occurrence of harelip and cleft palate cannot accurately be ascertained, inasmuch as statistics are not readily to be found. In the ‘St. Thomas’s Hospital Reports’ the number of malformations of the children born is noted in some of the years. Thus the aggregate number of living children born in their maternity department in the years 1875, 1877-1880, and 1883 was 10,653, and of this number there was only one case of harelip, with two cases of cleft palate, and three of the combined deformity, _i. e._ about one case in every 1800 infants born; but if the silence of the reports for subsequent years means absence of deformity, then this proportion may be much too great.