On reading in relation to literatureHearn, Lafcadio
General
On reading in relation to literature
Hearn, Lafcadio
Books and reading; Literature
With regard to the great modern masterpieces translated into English
from other tongues, I can only say that it is better to read them in
the originals, if you can. If you can read Goethe’s _Faust_ in German,
do not read it in English; and if you can read Heine in German, the
French translation in prose, which he superintended, and the English
translations (there are many of them) in verse can be of no use to you.
But if German be too difficult, then read _Faust_ in the prose version
of Hayward, as revised by Dr. Buchheim. You have that in the library;
and it is the best of the kind in existence. _Faust_ is a book that a
man should buy and keep, and read many times during his life. As for
Heine, he is a world poet, but he loses a great deal in translation;
and I can only recommend the French prose version of him; the English
versions of Browning and Lazarus and others are often weak. Some
years ago a series of extraordinary translations of Heine appeared in
_Blackwood’s Magazine_; but these have not appeared, I believe, in book
form.
As for Dante, I do not know whether he can make a strong appeal to you
in any language except his own; and you must understand the Middle Ages
very well to feel how wonderful he was. I might say something similar
about other great Italian poets. Of the French dramatists, you must
study Molière; he is next in importance only to Shakespeare. But do not
read him in any translation. Here I should say positively, that one
who cannot read French might as well leave Molière alone; the English
language cannot reproduce his delicacies of wit and allusion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account