On reading in relation to literatureHearn, Lafcadio
General
On reading in relation to literature
Hearn, Lafcadio
Books and reading; Literature
At the close of the second
examination the number is perhaps reduced to seven. These seven are
destined for a third reading; but the professional reader knows better
than to read them immediately. He leaves them locked up in a drawer,
and passes a whole week without looking at them. At the end of the
week he tries to see whether he can remember distinctly each of these
seven manuscripts and their qualities. Very distinctly he remembers
three; the remaining four he cannot at once recall. With a little
more effort, he is able to remember two more. But two he has utterly
forgotten. This is a fatal defect; the work that leaves no impression
upon the mind after two readings cannot have real value. He then takes
the manuscripts out of the drawer, condemns two (those he could not
remember), and re-reads the five. At the third reading everything
is judged--subject, execution, thought, literary quality. Three are
discovered to be first class; two are accepted by the publishers only
as second class. And so the matter ends.
Something like this goes on in all great publishing houses; but
unfortunately not all literary work is now judged in the same severe
way. It is now judged rather by what the public likes; and the public
does not like the best. But you may be sure that in a house such
as that of the Cambridge or the Oxford University publishers, the
test of a manuscript is very severe indeed; it is there read much
more thoroughly than it is likely ever to be read again. Now this
professional reader whom we speak of, with all his knowledge and
scholarship and experience, reads the book very much in the same
way as the child reads a fairy tale. He has forced his mind to exert
all its powers in the same minute way that the child’s mind does, to
think about everything in the book, in all its bearings, in a hundred
different directions. It is not true that a child is a bad reader; the
habit of bad reading is only formed much later in life, and is always
unnatural. The natural and also the scholarly way of reading is the
child’s way. But it requires what we are apt to lose as we grow up,
the golden gift of patience; and without patience nothing, not even
reading, can be well done.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account