On reading in relation to literatureHearn, Lafcadio
General
On reading in relation to literature
Hearn, Lafcadio
Books and reading; Literature
Important then as careful reading is, you can readily perceive that it
should not be wasted. The powers of a well-trained and highly educated
mind ought not to be expended upon any common book. By common I mean
cheap and useless literature. Nothing is so essential to self-training
as the proper choice of books to read; and nothing is so universally
neglected. It is not even right that a person of ability should
waste his time in “finding out” what to read. He can easily obtain
a very correct idea of the limits of the best in all departments of
literature, and keep to that best. Of course, if he has to become a
specialist, a critic, a professional reader, he will have to read what
is bad as well as what is good, and will be able to save himself from
much torment only by an exceedingly rapid exercise of judgment, formed
by experience. Imagine, for example, the reading that must have been
done, and thoroughly done, by such a critic as Professor Saintsbury.
Leaving out of the question all his university training, and his
mastery of Greek and Latin classics, which is no small reading to
begin with, he must have read some five thousand books in the English
of all centuries--learned thoroughly everything that was in them, the
history of each one, and the history of its author, whenever that
was accessible. He must also have mastered thoroughly the social and
political history relating to all this mass of literature. But this
is still less than half his work. For, being an authority upon two
literatures, his study of French, both old and new French, must have
been even more extensive than his study of English. And all his work
had to be read as a master reads; there was little more amusement in
the whole from beginning to end. The only pleasure could be in results;
but these results are very great. Nothing is more difficult in this
world than to read a book and then to express clearly and truly in a
few lines exactly what the literary value of the book is. There are
not more than twenty people in the world who can do this, for the
experience as well as the capacity required must be enormous. Very few
of us can hope to become even third or fourth class critics after a
lifetime of study. But we can all learn to read; and that is not by any
means a small feat. The great critics can best show us the way to do
this, by their judgment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account