On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
it would still be certain, that when the Idolatry was repented of and
forsaken, the grace reflowed through the accustomed channels of the
Mosaic Institutes. And in spite of all past idolatries, it had not been
wholly cut off even at the time of the Coming of CHRIST. In the next
place there is a false assumption concerning the sin of idolatry itself;
which seems to have been so severely visited as it was, because it was
the specifically forbidden sin, the protesting against which was one
great special object of the national existence of the Jews amidst a
godless world. It was not, surely, that GOD abhorred idol worship more
than murder, or uncleanness, or injustice; but it was, that “in Judah was
GOD to be known”—the one GOD—the forgotten GOD—amidst Gentile polytheism,
until the Coming of The Great Mediator. Every Divine interference with
that nation seemed to bear this as its reason, “That all the earth may
know that there is a GOD in Israel.”—“The LORD, He is the GOD! The LORD
He is the GOD!” (Joshua iv. 24; 1 Kings viii. 42, 43; Psalm lx.
throughout, &c.) Idolatry in that nation had a heinousness beyond all
other sin. And great as the guilt of idolatry must ever be, yet it can
hardly be called in the _same_ sense, the specific design of the
existence of the Christian Church, to protest against that sin beyond all
others. And until this can be made good, the strict parallel cannot be
established. In the third place, there is a further assumption of an
actual analogy of sinfulness in this particular, between the Jewish and
Christian Churches, which is not borne out by facts. Jewish idolatry
implied a voluntary and intentional abandonment of the worship of
JEHOVAH. Now this can in no wise be affirmed of the worst idolatry of
the Romish Hierarchy. No one will say that the Churches in communion
with Rome, ever intended to abandon the worship of GOD, for the sake of
Angels and Saints. It may be safely and truly said, that their reverence
paid to images, and their invocations of saints and angels, are of an
idolatrous nature, and calculated to lead, and have led, to idolatry in
the common people; but it would be unreasonable and untrue to say, that
the sin of the Church of Rome in this matter was the _same_ sin as that
of the Jews when they deliberately abandoned the worship of GOD. And,
therefore, we cannot argue from the one to the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account