On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series — John Shaqi
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
If we thus look into this objection fairly, we must see how very little
it amounts to. It depends throughout on unproved assumptions. And so
far as we may take the analogy in the case of the Jewish Church, it tells
directly against the objection. For there cannot be shown more, at most,
than a suspension of the grace of the Mosaic Institutes. And if even
Jewish idolatry, when repented of, was no impediment to the reflux of the
Divine blessing, so it might be in the Christian Church, even if it could
be proved universally guilty of the very sin of the Jews—which it cannot
be. In different ages, and at different places, some Churches, in
communion with Rome, have paid a highly sinful honour to Saints and their
images. The amount of such honour has varied greatly in degree, being
more or less sinful, at different times and places; yet at the worst, it
was never universal, in any essentially idolatrous degree. And even if
it had been, there would only (if the analogy were ever so strictly borne
out) be a suspension of still latent Apostolic grace, which any branches
of the Church might, on repentance, again enjoy. Far be it from us
indeed to palliate the sin, or the danger, of the idolatrous practices of
the present Church of Rome, but let a legitimate and not a superficial
estimate thereof be made. Instead of being misled by words, let us look
to principles. We are bound to protest against all which draws off the
heart from the true GOD and only SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST; and therefore
against Idolatry in all its forms. The Churches throughout the world, in
communion with that of Rome, have conformed to the practices of the
ungodly world in one way; but so have we in another. And as the
heathenish conformities and superstitions of Romanists are condemned by
St. Paul, when he forbids Christians even to “eat of things offered to
idols;” so the infidel coldness and individual selfishness of many
Protestants are equally condemned, when we are bidden to flee from
covetousness, “which is idolatry.” Whether, with some, we make idols of
a particular Church and the Saints,—or with others, make idols of Private
Judgment and Mammon, we are alike guilty. Let there be no rude,
impatient haste in judging of any Christians. So long as GOD bears with
us, we may well bear with one another. Idolatry, worse than the Romish,
was sanctioned by some of the Churches of Asia. But still they were
addressed as “Churches.” That very sanction of actual heathen idolatry,
which the Churches had been warned against, they were guilty of allowing.
Of both Pergamos and Thyatira it is said in sharp rebuke, that they
permitted some among them “to eat of things offered to idols,” which
almost amounted to an admission of those heathen gods. And yet, as
CHURCHES still, they are warned to “repent and do the FIRST works,” lest
GOD should be provoked to “remove their candlestick out of his place.”
So it was not removed as yet.—While the Church Catholic endures
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account