On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
7). And in the verses immediately following, we find a similar
injunction, and similar sacrificial allusions; (v. 11, 15–17.) Must we
not think that the Apostle recognized _some_ analogy between the Jewish
and the Christian Ministries? {89} But we have, in addition to such
manifold allusions, some passages much more direct and indisputable. In
writing to the Corinthians, St. Paul places the Eucharistic Table of the
LORD in a position precisely parallel with that of the Jewish Altar, and
founds his whole argument on it; (1 Cor. x. 13, &c.) and places together
on the same footing the Ministries of the Temple and of the Church, (ch.
ix. 13.) His argument for the right of the Christian Minister to a
temporal maintenance is wholly derived from the analogy of the Jewish
Priesthood; this would, then, be no argument, if there were no analogy.
His words are, “Do ye not know that they which Minister about holy
things, live of the things of the altar? _even so hath_ THE LORD
_ordained_, that they that preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel.”
Evidently the former Ministry is assumed to be the pattern of the
_latter_. But in another place, it is still more fully carried out. The
Apostle shows the Corinthians, that the analogy between the two
Ministries was such as to raise the Christian Ministry immeasurably
superior to the Jewish, both in privilege and power. What Jewish Priest
could ever use such exalted language as St. Paul had employed concerning
the punishment of sin? (1 Cor. v. 5.) or its pardon? (2 Cor. ii. 10, 11,
15.) And so he declared his Ministry to be much superior to that of
Moses himself. (2 Cor. iii. 7.) “If the Ministration of condemnation
(the Jewish Ministry) be glory, how much more doth the Ministration of
righteousness (the Christian) _exceed_ in glory? For even that which was
made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of that _which
excelleth_; for if that which was done away was glorious, _much more_
that which remaineth is glorious.” Moses, he further shows, had a
“veiled,” we an “unveiled” Ministry. “WE all with unveiled face,
beholding as in a glass, the glory of the Lord.” (v. 18.) “We preach not
_ourselves_,” indeed, he adds, “but CHRIST JESUS the LORD, AND Ourselves
your servants for JESUS’ sake; _for_ GOD . . . hath shined in OUR hearts,
to give the light of the knowledge of His glory.” (ch. iv. 6; see also
ch. v. 19, 20.)—The promises of abiding grace, “enduring” mercy, and
perpetual blessing to the ancient Israel, are commonly enough thought to
await fulfilment in the Church: so also, shall not the ancient promises
of an everlasting Priesthood, which were not fulfilled to the Jews, be
amply fulfilled in the CHURCH?—The ONE Priesthood of CHRIST “continueth
ever” manifested in HIS Church according to HIS will; “not after the law
of a carnal commandment, _but_ (_απαραβατον_) _after the power of an
endless life_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account