On the Genesis of SpeciesMivart, St. George Jackson
Religion
On the Genesis of Species
Mivart, St. George Jackson
Evolution (Biology)
That the opinion that species have definite though very different limits to
their variability is still tenable.
That certain fossil transitional forms are absent, which might have been
expected to be present.
That some facts of geographical distribution supplement other difficulties.
That the objection drawn from the physiological difference between
"species" and "races" still exists unrefuted.
That there are many remarkable phenomena in organic forms upon which
"Natural Selection" throws no light whatever, but the explanations of
which, if they could be attained, might throw light upon specific
origination. [Page 22]
Besides these objections to the sufficiency of "Natural Selection," others
may be brought against the hypothesis of "Pangenesis," which, professing as
it does to explain great difficulties, seems to do so by presenting others
not less great--almost to be the explanation of _obscurum per {23}
obscurius_.
* * * * *
CHAPTER II.
THE INCOMPETENCY OF "NATURAL SELECTION" TO ACCOUNT FOR THE INCIPIENT STAGES
OF USEFUL STRUCTURES.
Mr. Darwin supposes that natural selection acts by slight
variations.--These must be useful at once.--Difficulties as to the
giraffe; as to mimicry; as to the heads of flat-fishes; as to the
origin and constancy of the vertebrate limbs; as to whalebone; as to
the young kangaroo; as to sea-urchins; as to certain processes of
metamorphosis; as to the mammary gland; as to certain ape characters;
as to the rattlesnake and cobra; as to the process of formation of the
eye and ear; as to the fully developed condition of the eye and ear; as
to the voice; as to shell-fish; as to orchids; as to ants.--The
necessity for the simultaneous modification of many
individuals.--Summary and conclusion.
"Natural Selection," simply and by itself, is potent to explain the
maintenance or the further extension and development of favourable
variations, which are at once sufficiently considerable to be useful from
the first to the individual possessing them. But Natural Selection utterly
fails to account for the conservation and development of the minute and
rudimentary beginnings, the slight and infinitesimal commencements of
structures, however useful those structures may afterwards become.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account