On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroadCallières, Monsieur de (François)
History
On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroad
Callières, Monsieur de (François)
Ambassadors; Diplomacy; Negotiation; Princes
Besides the general public interests of the state there are private
and personal interests and ruling passions in princes and in their
ministers or favourites, which often play a determining part in
the direction of public policy. It is therefore necessary for the
negotiator to inform himself of the nature of these private interests
and passions influencing the spirits of those with whom he has to
negotiate, in order that he may guide his action by this knowledge
either in flattering their passions, which is the easiest way, or by
somehow finding means to deflect such personages from their original
intentions and engagements and cause them to adopt a new line of
policy. Such an enterprise carried to success would indeed be a
masterpiece of negotiation.
[Sidenote: _Testimony of the Duc de Rohan._]
That great man, the Duc de Rohan, tells us in the treatise which he
wrote upon the interests of European sovereigns, that the sovereigns
rule the people and that interest rules the sovereign; but we may add
that the passions of princes and of their ministers often overrule
their interests. We have seen many cases in which monarchs have entered
engagements most prejudicial to themselves and their state under the
influence of passion. There need be no surprise on this account, for
the nations themselves are not free from this error, and are prepared
to ruin themselves in order to satisfy hatred, vengeance, and jealousy,
the satisfaction of which is often antagonistic to their veritable
interests. Without recourse to ancient history it would be easy to
prove by modern examples that men do not act upon firm and stable
maxims of conduct; that as a rule they are governed by passion and
temperament more than by reason. The bearing of this knowledge upon
diplomacy is that since the passion and caprice of men in authority so
largely influence the destiny of their subjects, it is the duty of the
able negotiator to inform himself as accurately as possible regarding
the inclination, state of mind, and the plans of men in authority
in order that this information may be placed at the service of his
master’s interests. And we may be sure that a negotiator who has not
laboured to acquire a fund of this general and particular information
will reason falsely regarding events, affairs of state, and men, and
is liable to make false estimates and give dangerous advice to the
prince who employs him. Such knowledge is not to be found in books
alone; it is more easily to be gathered by personal communication with
those engaged in public service and by foreign travel, for, however
profoundly one may have studied the customs, the policy, or the
passions of those who govern in foreign states, everything will appear
differently when examined close at hand, and it is impossible to form
a just notion of the true character of things except by first-hand
acquaintance.
[Sidenote: _Importance of Foreign Travel._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account