On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroad — John Shaqi
On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroadCallières, Monsieur de (François)
History
On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroad
Callières, Monsieur de (François)
Ambassadors; Diplomacy; Negotiation; Princes
its prime, in which you find experience, discretion, and moderation,
combined with vigour.
[Sidenote: _Men of Letters._]
Other things being equal, I prefer a man of letters before one who has
not made a habit of study, for his reading will give him a certain
equipment which he might otherwise lack. It will adorn his conversation
and supply him with the necessary historic setting in which to
place his own negotiations; whereas an ignorant man will be able to
quote nothing but the will of his master, and will thus present his
argument in a naked and unattractive form. It must be obvious that the
knowledge gained in a lifetime of reading is an important adjunct in
diplomacy, and above all, the reading of history is to be preferred,
for without it the negotiator will be unable to understand the meaning
of historical allusions made by other diplomatists, and may thus miss
the whole point at some important turn in negotiations. And since it is
not enough to think aright, the diplomatist must be able to translate
his thoughts into the right language, and conversely he must be able to
pierce behind the language of others to their true thoughts. It may
often happen that an historical allusion will reveal the purpose of a
minister’s mind far better than any direct argument. Herein lies the
importance of culture in diplomacy. The name of orator has sometimes
been given to ambassadors because in certain past times they have
been in the habit of delivering their instructions in the form of an
eloquent address; but diplomatic eloquence is a very different thing
from that of Parliament or the Bar. An ambassador’s speeches should
contain more sense than words, and he should studiously avoid every
affectation. His aim should be to arouse the minds of his hearers by a
sympathetic touch, after which it will be easy to deliver his message
in an appropriate way. He should therefore at the outset think rather
of what is in their minds than of immediately expressing what is in his
own. It is in this that true eloquence consists, and indeed the words I
have just used are the beginning and end of all diplomacy.
[Sidenote: _The Fitting Mode of Address._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account