On the Stage--and Off: The Brief Career of a Would-Be ActorJerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
General
On the Stage--and Off: The Brief Career of a Would-Be Actor
Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
Actors -- Great Britain -- Biography; Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka), 1859-1927
As a matter of fact, nobody--at all events, none of the men, with the
exception of Chequers--seemed to care in the slightest about what
they should wear. “Chequers” was the name we had given to our walking
gentleman, as a delicate allusion to the pattern of his overcoat.
I think I have already described the leading features in this young
man’s private-life apparel. He went in a good deal for dress, and
always came out strong. His present ambition was to wear his new
ulster in the piece, and this he did, though, seeing that the action
of the play was supposed to take place a century ago, it was hardly
consistent with historical accuracy. But then historical accuracy was
not a strong point with our company, who went more on the principle
of what you happened to have by you. At the better class of London
theater, everything is now provided by the management, and the actor
has only to put on what is given him. But with the theaters and
companies into which I went, things were very different; costumes
being generally left to each person’s individual discretion. For
ordinary modern dress parts, we had to use our own things entirely,
and in all cases we were expected to find ourselves in hosiery and
boot leather, by which I mean such things as tights and stockings,
and the boots and shoes of every period and people; the rest of the
costume was provided for us--at all events in London.
In the provinces, where every article necessary for either a classical
tragedy or a pantomime has often to be found by the actor himself, I
have seen some very remarkable wardrobe effects. A costume play, under
these circumstances, rivaled a fancy dress ball in variety. It was
considered nothing out of the way for a father, belonging to the time
of George III, to have a son who, evidently from his dress, flourished
in the reign of Charles II. As for the supers, when there were any,
they were attired in the first thing that came to hand, and always
wore their own boots.
Picturesqueness was the great thing. Even now, and at some of the big
London houses, this often does duty for congruity and common sense.
The tendency to regard all female foreigners as Italian peasant girls,
and to suppose that all agricultural laborers wear red waistcoats
embroidered with yellow, still lingers on the stage.
Even where costumes were provided, the leading actors, and those who
had well-stocked wardrobes of their own, generally preferred to dress
the part themselves, and there was nobody who did not supplement the
costumier’s ideas to some greater or less extent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account