On the Stage--and Off: The Brief Career of a Would-Be ActorJerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
General
On the Stage--and Off: The Brief Career of a Would-Be Actor
Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
Actors -- Great Britain -- Biography; Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka), 1859-1927
The company was engaged at summer prices, which are a good deal less
than winter ones, and these latter average something less than the
wages of an industrious sweep. The public, who read of this actor
receiving a hundred and twenty pounds a night, of that actress making
eight hundred pounds a week, of a low comedian’s yearly income being
somewhere about six thousand pounds, and of a London manager who has
actually paid his rates and taxes (so he says), can scarcely have any
idea of what existence at the bottom of the stage ladder is like.
It is a long ladder, and there are very few who possess a personal
experience of both ends. Those who do, however, must appreciate the
contrast. Mr. Henry Irving, speaking somewhere of his early days,
mentions his weekly salary, I think, as having been twenty-five
shillings; and no doubt, at the time, he thought that very good, and
can most likely remember when he got less. In the provinces, thirty
shillings is a high figure for a good all-round “responsibles,” and
for that amount he is expected to be equal to Othello or Sir Peter
Teazle at a moment’s notice, and to find his own dress. A “lead” may
get three pounds in the winter, and a young “utility” thinks himself
very well off indeed on a guinea. Now and again, the latter will get
twenty-two or three shillings, but this only leads him into habits
of extravagance, and he suffers for it afterward. At the minor London
theaters, there being no expenses connected with traveling, etc., the
salaries are even less, and from eighteen shillings to two pounds are
about the sums _promised._
I do not believe I should ever have got even the salary I did, if it
had not been for the extraordinary circumstance of a really successful
season, so successful, indeed, that the fact could not be disguised,
and, for the last three or four months--excess of good fortune having
evidently turned the manager’s head--salaries were paid _regularly
and in full!_ This is not romancing, it is plain, sober truth. Such
a thing may surprise my readers, especially those who know much about
the stage, but it cannot surprise them one fiftieth part so much as it
surprised us. It completely bewildered the majority of the company. To
have anything more than five shillings paid to them at one time
seemed to confuse them, and, on treasury days, they went away from the
theater with a puzzled air of affluence and responsibility.
They had not been accustomed to receiving salaries in that way. What
they had been used to was, say, two-and-sixpence one day, sixpence at
the beginning of the next night, another twopence after the first act,
and eightpence as they were going away.
“That makes one-and-four you’ve had to-night, and two-and-sixpence
last night makes three-and-ten, mind.”
“Yes, but, hang it all, you know, there was four shillings owing from
last week, and five-and-sixpence from the week before, that I’ve never
had yet.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account