Ontology, or the Theory of BeingCoffey, P. (Peter)
Philosophy
Ontology, or the Theory of Being
Coffey, P. (Peter)
Ontology
Amid the almost uninterrupted disintegration of systems during the
last three centuries, the philosophy of St. Thomas has alone been
able to stand the shock of criticism; it alone has proved
sufficiently solid and comprehensive to serve as an intellectual
basis and unifying principle for all the new facts and phenomena
brought to light by the modern sciences. And unless we are much
mistaken, those who take up and follow this philosophy will come
to think, as we do, that on the analysis of mental acts and
processes, on the inner nature of corporeal things, of living
things, and of man, on the existence and nature of God, on the
foundations of speculative and moral science, none have thought or
written more wisely than St. Thomas Aquinas. But though we place
our programme and teaching under the patronage of the illustrious
name of this prince of scholastics, we do not regard the Thomistic
philosophy as an ideal beyond possibility of amelioration, or as a
boundary to the activity of the human mind. We do think, however,
on mature reflection, that we are acting no less wisely than
modestly in taking it as our starting-point and constant standard
of reference. This we say in answer to those of our friends and
enemies who are occasionally pleased to ask us if we really do
mean to lead back the modern mind into the Middle Ages, and to
identify philosophy _simply_ with the thought of any _one_
philosopher. Manifestly, we mean nothing of the kind. Has not Leo
XIII., the great initiator of the new scholastic movement,
expressly warned us(37) to be mindful of the present: “Edicimus
libenti gratoque animo recipiendum esse quidquid sapienter dictum,
quidquid utiliter fuerit a quopiam inventum atque excogitatum”?
St. Thomas himself would be the first to rebuke those who would
follow his own philosophical opinions in all things against their
own better judgment, and to remind them of what he wrote at the
head of his _Summa_: that in philosophy, of all arguments that
based on human authority is the weakest, “locus ab auctoritate quæ
fundatur super ratione humana, est infirmissimus.”(38)
Again, therefore, let us assert that respect for tradition is not
servility but mere elementary prudence. Respect for a doctrine of
whose soundness and worth we are personally convinced is not
fetishism; it is but a rational and rightful tribute to the
dominion of Truth over Mind.
Modern scholastics will know how to take to heart and profit by
the lessons of the seventeenth and eighteenth century
controversies; they will avoid the mistakes of their predecessors;
they will keep in close contact with the special sciences
subsidiary to philosophy and with the views and teachings of
modern and contemporary thinkers.(39)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account