Of close co-operation by the horse artillery in the charges of cavalry
against infantry there is practically little or no trace in the
battles of 1870. The training of cavalry and horse artillery and the
organization of the cavalry division had not proceeded on these lines,
as is evident from the fact that there is no mention of it in books
such as Von Schmidt before that war, or in Prince Kraft’s _Letters on
Cavalry_ after it. The latter writer shows that the tendency was to
deprive the cavalry division of its horse artillery when a battle took
place, and put it with the corps artillery. It was claimed that by so
doing the horse artillery were practically of double use.
The batteries remain as a rule with the corps artillery. If the
cavalry division is sent forward, they are attached to it. If a
battle takes place during which the cavalry division is held in
reserve, then the horse artillery becomes again a part of the corps
artillery and considerably augments its fire. The horse artillery
of the Guards corps was thus employed in 1870.
For a cavalry division which takes part in a great battle _does not
require any horse artillery_. It is held at first in reserve.
If it is called upon to attack it is obliged to make use of an
opportunity of charging broken troops of the enemy. There is thus
no need to break up its enemy with artillery fire, and there is,
besides, no time to do so.
Compare with the above the 1907 amendments to the German _Exerzier
Reglement für die Kavallerie 1895_, No. 375:
In a general engagement the batteries and machine guns told off to
the cavalry _will remain with them_, because they are indispensable
to the cavalry in the fulfilment of their special duties during,
and particularly after, the battle.
The cavalry leader must, however, judge whether the general
position does not rather demand the employment of his batteries in
co-operation with the rest of the artillery. The horse artillery
and machine guns will be of the greatest use in a general
engagement when the cavalry are operating against the enemy’s
flanks and rear. Their sudden appearance from a flank or from the
rear is certain to produce a strong moral effect on the enemy.
There could scarcely be a greater _volte face_ than is indicated by
these two extracts.
Further, what we read of the use of masses of cavalry at the present
date, in both the German and French manœuvres, leads us to the
conclusion that their cavalry and horse artillery will be kept together
in a general engagement and used for the sledge-hammer blow on both
shaken and unshaken infantry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account