As in birth control so in other matters of sex intimacy the growth
of cities and the complexity of our economy may be the more potent
factors of change. In very large communities there is an ignorance
of the personal relations of others, an inevitable ignoring which
contributes unconsciously to tolerance toward experiment and variation
in sex relations. Indifference to the private life of others is almost
an exigency of our economic organization. Attention is directed to the
efficiency of the personality encountered and away from the individual
means taken to induce that efficiency. What difference does it make
to an employer how clerk or stenographer lives after hours provided
he or she is competent, alert, and responsive to the business need?
In office or in factory one may be but a cog in the machine and yet
left larger personal freedom than in a more independent job in a small
place or than in a household. Out of such urban influences--negatively,
of indifference, and positively, of attention to personality _per
se_--come opportunities for personal freedom that will set men and
women to ordering their sex life to please themselves rather than to
please society. That is, ordinary men and women; certain outstanding
figures will have to continue to forego freedom. The President of the
United States, presidents of banks or colleges, cinematograph stars,
“society ladies,” now and again a clergyman or a prize-fighter--all
these will continue to be observed closely in their private life, and,
like the gods and goddesses of other cultures or times, will have to
conform to popular preconceptions of marriage or celibacy, chastity or
libertinism. For them, as for other personages in folk-lore, individual
adjustment or variation would be out of the picture.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Dr. Ogburn informs me that his recent and still unpublished
analysis of the census of 1920 shows that in localities where birth
control is presumedly practiced the marriage rate mounts. He states
also that in the country at large there has been a higher marriage rate
in the last census decade and that the age at marriage is earlier.
Toward Monogamy
By Charlotte Perkins Gilman
Charlotte Perkins Gilman
_feminist, philosopher, writer was born at Hartford, Conn., July 3rd,
1860. Editor of the_ Forerunner _1909-1916; Author of “Women and
Economics,” 1898; “In This, Our World,” 1898; “The Yellow Wall-Paper,”
1899; “Concerning Children,” 1900; “The Home, Its Work and Influence,”
1903; “Human Work,” 1904; “What Diantha Did,” 1910; “The Man-Made
World,” 1910; “The Crux,” 1911; “Moving the Mountain,” 1911; “His
Religion and Hers,” 1923._
TOWARD MONOGAMY
BY CHARLOTTE PERKINS GILMAN
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account