There are two different lines of argument by which it is possible to
attack the general belief that there are universal absolute rules of
moral conduct, and that any one who infringes them is wicked. One
line of argument emerges from the anthropological facts which we have
already considered. Broadly speaking the views of the average man on
sexual ethics are those appropriate to the economic system existing
in the time of his great-grandfather. Morality has varied as economic
systems have varied, lagging always about three generations behind. As
soon as people realize this they find it impossible to suppose that
the particular brand of marriage customs prevailing in their own age
and nation represents eternal verities, whereas all earlier and later
marriage customs, and all those prevailing in other latitudes and
longitudes, are vicious and degraded. This shows that we ought to be
prepared for changes in marriage customs, but does not tell us what
changes we ought to desire.
The second line of argument is more positive and more important.
Popular morality--including that of the churches, though not that of
the great mystics--lays down rules of conduct rather than ends of life.
The morality that ought to exist would lay down ends of life rather
than rules of conduct. Christ says: “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as
thyself”; this lays down one of the ends of life. The Decalogue says:
“Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath Day”; this lays down a rule
of action. Christ’s conduct to the woman taken in adultery showed the
conflict between love and moral rules. All his priests, down to our own
day, have gone directly contrary to his teachings on this point, and
have shown themselves invariably willing to cast the first stone. The
belief in the importance of rules of conduct is superstitious; what
is important is to care for good ends. A good man is a man who cares
for the happiness of his relations and friends, and, if possible, for
that of mankind in general, or, again, a man who cares for art and
science. Whether such a man obeys the moral rules laid down by the Jews
thousands of years ago is quite unimportant. Moreover a man may obey
all these rules and yet be extremely bad.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account