United States. Navy -- History -- World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations, American
The British mission, which was headed by the distinguished Mr. Balfour,
arrived on April 21st. Its members brought the inside story of
conditions, particularly in the desperate fight against the submarine.
They had been met at Halifax and welcomed on behalf of the Navy by
Admiral Frank F. Fletcher, who accompanied them to Washington. Mr.
Balfour had, until a short time before, been First Civil Lord of the
Admiralty. With him as naval representative was Admiral Dudley S. de
Chair. They emphasized the seriousness of the submarine sinkings,
holding back nothing. American officials discussed the necessity of
new naval offenses; attacking the German bases or constructing mine
barrages to prevent egress and ingress of submarines and other plans
to end the U-boat menace. As representative of the foremost sea power,
the interchange of views between Admiral de Chair and our naval experts
was most helpful. The Admiral was well pleased with the arrangements
completed earlier in the month with Admiral Browning and with our broad
plans and construction program.
Naval Allied coöperation was strengthened by conferences with the
Prince of Udine, and the Italian mission; the Belgian mission headed by
Baron Ludovic Moncheur; the Russian mission, whose naval representative
was the ill-fated Admiral Kolchak; the Japanese mission, which
included the able Vice Admiral Takeshita--all these and other special
representatives who came from time to time or remained attached to
their embassies in Washington. Later the British Admiralty sent as its
representative Admiral Lowther Grant, who was in almost daily touch
with officers of the Navy Department until the close of the war and won
the regard of all.
Through the United States Naval Representative in London, American
admirals on duty at Brest and Gibraltar and naval attachés abroad, the
representatives of the Allied navies in Washington, who were kept fully
informed by their governments, and the diplomatic and naval missions,
the Navy Department was enabled to reach its decisions with all the
possible lights before it. It never had to depend upon any single
source of information.
These conferences at Washington were of the utmost importance because
all large policies had to be settled by the Navy Department. Officers
abroad were in command of ships assigned to them, and in emergencies
upon their own initiative employed their forces to the best advantage.
The ships overseas never were under independent command, but, as
distinctly stated in orders, constituted a "task force of the Atlantic
Fleet." Their orders stated: "The individuality of the United States
forces should be such that they may be continuously ready to change
their areas of operations as may be made necessary or by orders of the
Navy Department."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account