It is true that infidels have often brought forward some branch of
Science in confutation of Scripture, but it is also a fact that in
nearly every such case, the very arguments that have been used by these
men, have at last become the strongest arguments on the other side.
Geology was at first adduced as a proof that the world had existed
from all eternity, instead of having been created by an Omnipotent
God, and the question had often been asked, "Can you produce one proof
of the creation of anything?" Now this was a difficult question to
answer, until Geology made manifest the fact that Man was created, by
producing a clear and unimpeachable proof that up to a certain time, he
did _not_ exist on the earth, and that at a period of time, a little
later, he _did_ exist; the space between these epochs is not known,
but it has nothing to do with the argument, for within that period
(whatever it may have been) Man _was_ created, and created as perfect
in his physical organisation as he is at present--no long series of
developments from the higher animals by fortuitous circumstances, as
some pretend--no gradual addition of parts to suit the physical changes
of the earth's surface. There is undoubted proof from the oldest
records, in the form of Sculptures, that Man's appearance has always
been the same, and the records of the Bible (the _antiquity_ of which,
at all events, cannot be disputed) show that the constitution of his
mind was at that time just as it is now--every passion, every desire
the same--the only advance he has made, is in the knowledge of God's
works; the application of that knowledge to his own benefit, and the
glorification of his Maker.
THE SKY.
[Illustration: FIG. 11. TELESCOPIC APPEARANCE OF THE MOON.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account