Outlines of Zuñi Creation Myths: Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1891-1892, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1896, pages 321-448 — John Shaqi
Outlines of Zuñi Creation Myths: Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1891-1892, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1896, pages 321-448Cushing, Frank Hamilton
History
Outlines of Zuñi Creation Myths: Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1891-1892, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1896, pages 321-448
Cushing, Frank Hamilton
Zuni mythology
Linguistically the Zuñi Indians of today stand alone, unrelated,
so far as has heretofore been determined, to any other Indians
either sedentary, like themselves, or unsettled, like the less
advanced peoples of the plains. Nevertheless, although they as yet
thus constitute a single linguistic stock, there are present and
persistent among them two distinct types of physique and numerous
survivals--inherited, not borrowed--of the arts, customs, myths, and
institutions of at least two peoples, unrelated at first, or else
separate and very diversely conditioned for so long a period of their
preunited history that their development had progressed unequally and
along quite different lines, at the time of their final coalition. That
thus the Zuñis are actually descendants of two or more peoples, and
the heirs of two cultures at least, is well shown in their legends of
ruins and olden times, and especially in these myths of creation and
migration as interpreted by archeologic and ethnographic research.
According to all these tokens and evidences, one branch of their
ancestral people was, as compared with the other, aboriginal in the
region comprising the present Zuñi country and extending far toward
the north, whence at some remoter time they had descended. The other
branch was intrusive, from the west or southwest, the country of the
lower Rio Colorado, their earliest habitat not so clearly defined and
their remoter derivation enigmatical, for they were much more given
to wandering, less advanced in the peaceful arts, and their earliest
ruins are those of comparatively rude and simple structures, hence
scant and difficult to trace, at least beyond the western borders of
Arizona. Considering both of these primary or parental stocks of the
Zuñi as having been thus so widely asunder at first, the ancestral
relations of the aboriginal or northern branch probably ranged the
plains north of the arid mountain region of Utah and Colorado ere
they sought refuge in the desert and canyons of these territories.
Yet others of their descendants, if still surviving, may not unlikely
be traced among not only other Pueblos, but also and more distinctly
among wilder and remoter branches, probably of the Shoshonean stock.
The ancestral relations of the intrusive or western branch, however,
were a people resembling the semisettled Yumans and Pimans in mode of
life, their ruins combining types of structure characteristic of both
these stocks; and if their descendants, other than Zuñis themselves,
be yet identified among Yuman tribes, or some like people of the lower
Colorado region, they will be found (such of them as survive) not
greatly changed, probably, from the condition they were all in when,
at a very distant time, their eastward faring kinsfolk, who ultimately
became Zuñis, left them there.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account