Banks and banking -- Fiction; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction; Love stories
He was an out-of-door man, and that, in his position, was the pity of
it. Aldersbury School—and Aldersbury was a very famous school in those
days—and Cambridge had done little to alter the tendency: possibly the
latter, seated in the midst of wide open spaces, under a wide sky, the
fens its neighbors, had done something to strengthen his bent.
Bourdillon thought of him with contempt, as a clodhopper, a rustic,
hinting that he was a throwback to an ancestor, not too remote, who had
followed the plough and whistled for want of thought. But he did
Clement an injustice. It was possible that in his love of the soil he
was a throwback; he would have made, and indeed he was, a good
ploughman. He had learnt the trick with avidity, giving good money,
solid silver shillings, that Hodge might rest while he worked. But, a
ploughman, he would not have turned a clod without noticing its
quality, nor sown a seed without considering its fitness, nor observed
a rare plant without wondering why it grew in that position, nor looked
up without drawing from the sky some sign of the weather or the hour.
Much less would he have gazed down a woodland glade, flecked with
sunlight, without perceiving its beauty.
He was, indeed, both in practice and theory a lover of Nature;
breathing freely its open air, understanding its moods, asking nothing
better than to be allowed to turn them to his purpose. Though he was no
great reader, he read Wordsworth, and many a line was fixed in his
memory and, on occasions when he was alone, rose to his lips.
But he hated the desk and he hated figures. His thoughts as he stood
behind the bank counter, or drummed his restless heels against the legs
of his high stool, were far away in fallow and stubble, or where the
trout, that he could tickle as to the manner born, lay under the caving
bank. And to his father and to those who judged him by the bank
standard, and felt for him half scornful liking, he seemed to be an
inefficient, a trifler. They said in Aldersbury that it was lucky for
him that he had a father.
Perhaps of all about him it was from that father that he could expect
the least sympathy. Ovington was not only a banker, he was a banker to
whom his business was everything. He had created it. It had made him.
It was not in his eyes a mere adjunct, as in the eyes of one born in
the purple and to the leisure which invites to the higher uses of
wealth. Able he was, and according to his lights honorable; but a
narrow education had confined his views, and he saw in his money merely
the means to rise in the world and eventually to become one of the
landed class which at that time monopolized all power and all
influence, political as well as social. Such a man could only see in
Clement a failure, a reversion to the yeoman type, and own with sorrow
the irony of fortune that so often delights to hand on the sceptre of
an Oliver to a “Tumble-down-Dick.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account