Oxford and the Rhodes ScholarshipsScholz, R. F. (Richard Frederick)
History
Oxford and the Rhodes Scholarships
Scholz, R. F. (Richard Frederick)
Rhodes scholarships
It was therefore a question of prime importance to what extent it
would be necessary, and then how far desirable and advisable, that
the equipment of Rhodes Scholars should approximate to that of their
college-mates-to-be, and in what respects they might advantageously
differ.
It was pointed out in the Conferences:—
That the English ‘Public School’ gives a boy an opportunity to
distinguish himself through its elaborate system of athletics and
scholarship examinations at an earlier age than is usual in Colonial or
American Secondary Schools.
That the American or Colonial student after two or more years of college
or University life at home would be much better fitted to enter Oxford
without handicap than if he went directly from his Secondary School.
That for the sake of understanding the English University from the
American point of view and the American University from the English point
of view, likewise for understanding and comparing other institutions, and
above all for the sake of his later life when he should return to live in
his own country, he ought to have a preliminary experience of University
life in his own country.
That in order to appreciate and make the most of the advantages or
opportunities which his position as a Rhodes Scholar would offer him, and
to avoid the temptations to idleness to which Oxford would expose him
and the variety of temptations which the long Vacation present, and in
order that he might know, and remain in thoughtful and intimate sympathy
with affairs in his own country, it would be greatly to his advantage
to be more mature than the average graduate of the Colonial or American
Secondary School, or than the ordinary Oxford matriculant.
W. T. Harris, United States Commissioner of Education, said in
1902:[20]—‘It would seem best that our candidates for the Rhodes
Scholarships should all have obtained a preparation amounting to that
required for the A.B. degree.’ The consensus of opinion, while not going
to that length, was that at least two years of previous College or
University life should be required, and with few exceptions this was made
the rule.[21]
In cases where a Committee expressly asked leave to appoint from
Secondary Schools, leave was granted. (This privilege has not been made
use of.) Two years’ college requirements were adopted for Canada, for
four of the six Australian States, and for New Zealand.
Three of the four South African schools to which Scholarships were
especially assigned, asked to be allowed to send pupils who had pursued
their work after leaving school for at least two years at the Cape
University.
Queensland, West Australia, Natal, Rhodesia, Newfoundland, Bermuda, and
Jamaica are the only Colonies where two years’ University standing is not
insisted on.[22]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account