Pages from a Journal with Other PapersWhite, William Hale
General
Pages from a Journal with Other Papers
White, William Hale
English essays
The reader will perhaps ask, What has this theology to do with the “joy
continuous and supreme”? We shall presently meet with some deductions
which contribute to it, but it is not difficult to understand that
Spinoza, to use his own word, might call the truths set forth in these
propositions “blessed.” Let a man once believe in that God of infinite
attributes of which thought and extension are those by which He manifests
Himself to us; let him see that the opposition between thought and matter
is fictitious; that his mind “is a part of the infinite intellect of
God”; that he is not a mere transient, outside interpreter of the
universe, but himself the soul or law, which is the universe, and he will
feel a relationship with infinity which will emancipate him.
It is not true that in Spinoza’s God there is so little that is positive
that it is not worth preserving. All Nature is in Him, and if the
objector is sincere he will confess that it is not the lack of contents
in the idea which is disappointing, but a lack of contents particularly
interesting to himself.
The opposition between the mind and body of man as two diverse entities
ceases with that between thought and extension. It would be impossible
briefly to explain in all its fulness what Spinoza means by the
proposition: “The object of the idea constituting the human mind is a
body” {39}; it is sufficient here to say that, just as extension and
thought are one, considered in different aspects, so body and mind are
one. We shall find in the fifth part of the _Ethic_ that Spinoza affirms
the eternity of the mind, though not perhaps in the way in which it is
usually believed.
Following the order of the _Ethic_ we now come to its more directly
ethical maxims. Spinoza denies the freedom commonly assigned to the
will, or perhaps it is more correct to say he denies that it is
intelligible. The will is determined by the intellect. The idea of the
triangle involves the affirmation or volition that its three angles are
equal to two right angles. If we understand what a triangle is we are
not “free” to believe that it contains more or less than two right
angles, nor to act as if it contained more or less than two. The only
real freedom of the mind is obedience to the reason, and the mind is
enslaved when it is under the dominion of the passions. “God does not
act from freedom of the will,” {40a} and consequently “things could have
been produced by God in no other manner and in no other order than that
in which they have been produced.” {40b}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account