Parents and childrenMason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Philosophy
Parents and children
Mason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Child rearing; Education -- Parent participation
And such praise is sweet in the ears of many a fond mother hungering
for the love and liking of her children, and not perceiving that words
like these in the mouth of a child are as treasonable as words of
defiance.
Authority is laid down at other shrines than that of popularity.
Prospero describes himself as,
“all dedicate
To study, and the bettering of my mind.”
And, meantime, the exercise of authority devolves upon Antonio; is it
any wonder that the habit of authority fits the usurper like a glove,
and that Prospero finds himself ousted from the office he failed to
fill? Even so, the busy parent, occupied with many cares, awakes to
find the authority he has failed to wield has dropped out of his hands;
perhaps has been picked up by others less fit, and a daughter is given
over to the charge of a neighbouring family, while father and mother
hunt for rare prints.
In other cases, the love of an easy life tempts parents to let things
take their course; the children are good children, and won’t go far
wrong, we are told; and very likely it is true. But however good the
children be, the parents owe it to society to make them better than
they are, and to bless the world with people, not merely good-natured
and well-disposed, but good of set purpose and endeavour.
The love of ease, the love of favour, the claims of other work,
are only some of the causes which lead to a result disastrous to
society--the _abdication of parents_. When we come to consider the
nature and uses of the parents’ authority, we shall see that such
abdication is as immoral as it is mischievous. Meantime, it is well
worth while to notice that the causes which lead parents to resign the
position of domestic rulers are resolvable into one--the office is too
troublesome, too laborious. The temptation which assails parents is the
same which has led many a crowned head to seek ease in the cloister--
“Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown,”
if it be the natural crown of parenthood.
The Apostolic counsel of “diligence” in ruling throws light upon the
nature and aim of authority: it is no longer a matter of personal
honour and dignity; authority is for use and service, and the honour
that goes with it is only for the better service of those under
authority. The arbitrary parent, the exacting parent, who claims this
and that of deference and duty because he is a parent, all for his own
honour and glory, is more hopelessly in the wrong than the parent who
practically abdicates; the majesty of parenthood is hedged round with
observances only because it is good for the children to “faithfully
serve, honour, and humbly obey” their natural rulers. Only at home can
children be trained in the chivalrous temper of “proud submission and
dignified obedience;” and if the parents do not inspire and foster
deference, reverence, and loyalty, how shall these crowning graces of
character thrive in a hard and emulous world?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account